Can mental health apps be effective for depression, anxiety, and stress during a pandemic?

Robert L. Longyear, Kostadin Kushlev
{"title":"Can mental health apps be effective for depression, anxiety, and stress during a pandemic?","authors":"Robert L. Longyear, Kostadin Kushlev","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/zy2ct","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 is poised to exacerbate the global mental health crisis as social isolation, unemployment, and economic recession are risk factors for negative mental health consequences. Since the need for social distancing can make face-to-face services less accessible, people may turn to mental health apps as an accessible and inexpensive solution. But are the claims about the efficacy of these apps supported by evidence? We identified 19 published articles on PubMed of peer-reviewed randomized clinical trials of mental health apps focused on stress, anxiety, and depression. Despite some evidence for the effectiveness of mental health apps, it remains unclear how effective these apps are compared to standard of care. Populations studied so far also lack diversity, making it difficult to generalize any benefits to racial minorities and low-income individuals—the very people who have been most negatively impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic and traditionally have higher barriers to mental health services. While apps are not a substitute for face-to-face therapy, further evidence is warranted given their potential for delivering scalable, low-cost care to patients. We call for regulatory oversight as a means to ensure mental health apps demonstrate safety and effectiveness prior to marketing.","PeriodicalId":74486,"journal":{"name":"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zy2ct","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Covid-19 is poised to exacerbate the global mental health crisis as social isolation, unemployment, and economic recession are risk factors for negative mental health consequences. Since the need for social distancing can make face-to-face services less accessible, people may turn to mental health apps as an accessible and inexpensive solution. But are the claims about the efficacy of these apps supported by evidence? We identified 19 published articles on PubMed of peer-reviewed randomized clinical trials of mental health apps focused on stress, anxiety, and depression. Despite some evidence for the effectiveness of mental health apps, it remains unclear how effective these apps are compared to standard of care. Populations studied so far also lack diversity, making it difficult to generalize any benefits to racial minorities and low-income individuals—the very people who have been most negatively impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic and traditionally have higher barriers to mental health services. While apps are not a substitute for face-to-face therapy, further evidence is warranted given their potential for delivering scalable, low-cost care to patients. We call for regulatory oversight as a means to ensure mental health apps demonstrate safety and effectiveness prior to marketing.
在大流行期间,心理健康应用程序对抑郁、焦虑和压力有效吗?
新冠肺炎将加剧全球心理健康危机,因为社会孤立、失业和经济衰退是负面心理健康后果的风险因素。由于保持社交距离的需求会降低面对面服务的可访问性,人们可能会将心理健康应用程序作为一种可访问且廉价的解决方案。但是,关于这些应用程序功效的说法有证据支持吗?我们在PubMed上发现了19篇发表的文章,这些文章是针对压力、焦虑和抑郁的心理健康应用程序的同行评审随机临床试验。尽管有一些证据表明心理健康应用程序的有效性,但与标准护理相比,这些应用程序的效果如何仍不清楚。到目前为止,所研究的人群也缺乏多样性,这使得很难将任何福利推广到少数种族和低收入个人身上,而这些人正是受新冠肺炎疫情影响最严重、传统上获得心理健康服务障碍更高的人。虽然应用程序不能替代面对面的治疗,但鉴于其为患者提供可扩展、低成本护理的潜力,有必要提供进一步的证据。我们呼吁进行监管,以确保心理健康应用程序在上市前表现出安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信