Between Early Prevention and Statutory Intervention: Meeting the Needs for Targeted Support for Children and Families

G. Meads, Kat Butler
{"title":"Between Early Prevention and Statutory Intervention: Meeting the Needs for Targeted Support for Children and Families","authors":"G. Meads, Kat Butler","doi":"10.22158/CT.V1N2P84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject is services for vulnerable children aged up to fourteen years and their families in the Winchester area of southern England. The services comprise three group-work based programmes, each lasting for twelve months. Their review comprised a two stage study designed to scope future objectives for a host charity in its development alongside faith agencies. The first stage used a Delphi process to define the principal priorities of trustees. These were then rated and applied to a follow up client satisfaction survey across the three programmes for 40 families. The overall 55% rate indicated a positive response from service users with a multi-dimensional approach to resilience building strongly endorsed. However, the analysis also scoped three areas for improvement. Findings indicated first, that the significance of help with preparation for work and education is understated by trustees less familiar with employment shortfalls; secondly that family focused services should recognize the particular needs of fathers and not be slanted towards mothers and their children; and thirdly, decisions on social enterprise status must take into account potential disconnects between the values of service recipients and those of different socio-economic means in governance roles. These findings are relevant to comparable voluntary sector agencies.","PeriodicalId":72575,"journal":{"name":"Children and teenagers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and teenagers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/CT.V1N2P84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject is services for vulnerable children aged up to fourteen years and their families in the Winchester area of southern England. The services comprise three group-work based programmes, each lasting for twelve months. Their review comprised a two stage study designed to scope future objectives for a host charity in its development alongside faith agencies. The first stage used a Delphi process to define the principal priorities of trustees. These were then rated and applied to a follow up client satisfaction survey across the three programmes for 40 families. The overall 55% rate indicated a positive response from service users with a multi-dimensional approach to resilience building strongly endorsed. However, the analysis also scoped three areas for improvement. Findings indicated first, that the significance of help with preparation for work and education is understated by trustees less familiar with employment shortfalls; secondly that family focused services should recognize the particular needs of fathers and not be slanted towards mothers and their children; and thirdly, decisions on social enterprise status must take into account potential disconnects between the values of service recipients and those of different socio-economic means in governance roles. These findings are relevant to comparable voluntary sector agencies.
在早期预防和法定干预之间:满足对儿童和家庭有针对性的支持需求
主题是为英格兰南部温彻斯特地区14岁以下的弱势儿童及其家人提供服务。这些服务包括三个以小组工作为基础的方案,每个方案为期12个月。他们的审查包括一项分两个阶段的研究,旨在确定主办慈善机构与信仰机构共同发展的未来目标。第一阶段使用德尔菲程序来确定受托人的主要优先事项。然后对这些指标进行评分,并将其应用于针对40个家庭的三个项目的后续客户满意度调查。55%的总体比率表明,服务用户的积极反应强烈支持建立复原力的多维度方法。然而,该分析还确定了三个需要改进的领域。调查结果表明,首先,不太熟悉就业短缺的受托人低估了帮助做好工作和教育准备的重要性;第二,以家庭为重点的服务应认识到父亲的特殊需要,而不是倾向于母亲及其子女;第三,关于社会企业地位的决定必须考虑到服务接受者的价值观与不同社会经济手段在治理作用中的价值观之间的潜在脱节。这些调查结果与类似的志愿部门机构有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信