Hospital costs of post-operative delirium: A systematic review

Q3 Nursing
Md. Parvez Mosharaf, Khorshed Alam, N. Ralph, J. Gow
{"title":"Hospital costs of post-operative delirium: A systematic review","authors":"Md. Parvez Mosharaf, Khorshed Alam, N. Ralph, J. Gow","doi":"10.26550/2209-1092.1165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: In this systematic review, the primary aim is to investigate the hospital cost burden attributed to post-operative delirium (POD). A secondary aim is to examine how patient length of stay (LOS) in hospital varies across the selected studies. Background: POD is a common occurrence after major surgery and leads to serious medical complications. It is associated with increased morbidity and double the risk of mortality from surgery compared to non-delirious patients. POD increases patient LOS in hospital and increases the economic burden on patients and the health system. Design: A systematic review was conducted. Method: Published articles in English over the period 2010 to 2020 were searched using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The study quality and risks of bias of included studies were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Results: A total of 2539 published records were initially screened and ultimately ten studies were found to be relevant to the review criteria. Six studies were from the United States of America (USA) and the others from South Korea, Australia, and Canada. The additional costs for patients with POD ranged from a minimum of US$1551 to a maximum of US$23 698 compared to non-delirious patients. Costs were higher in the USA than other countries. Studies reported most surgical patients experiencing POD were aged 70 years or older which dramatically increases the risk of its occurrence and increases LOS and hospital related costs. The difference in LOS between POD and non-delirious patients ranged from 0.8 to 7.3 days and this increased significantly if POD patients were in intensive care. Conclusions: Increased LOS and increased hospital costs are strongly associated with POD after major surgery.","PeriodicalId":37332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perioperative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perioperative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: In this systematic review, the primary aim is to investigate the hospital cost burden attributed to post-operative delirium (POD). A secondary aim is to examine how patient length of stay (LOS) in hospital varies across the selected studies. Background: POD is a common occurrence after major surgery and leads to serious medical complications. It is associated with increased morbidity and double the risk of mortality from surgery compared to non-delirious patients. POD increases patient LOS in hospital and increases the economic burden on patients and the health system. Design: A systematic review was conducted. Method: Published articles in English over the period 2010 to 2020 were searched using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The study quality and risks of bias of included studies were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Results: A total of 2539 published records were initially screened and ultimately ten studies were found to be relevant to the review criteria. Six studies were from the United States of America (USA) and the others from South Korea, Australia, and Canada. The additional costs for patients with POD ranged from a minimum of US$1551 to a maximum of US$23 698 compared to non-delirious patients. Costs were higher in the USA than other countries. Studies reported most surgical patients experiencing POD were aged 70 years or older which dramatically increases the risk of its occurrence and increases LOS and hospital related costs. The difference in LOS between POD and non-delirious patients ranged from 0.8 to 7.3 days and this increased significantly if POD patients were in intensive care. Conclusions: Increased LOS and increased hospital costs are strongly associated with POD after major surgery.
术后谵妄的住院费用:一项系统综述
目的:在本系统综述中,主要目的是调查术后谵妄(POD)引起的医院费用负担。第二个目的是检查所选研究中患者住院时间(LOS)的变化情况。背景:POD是大手术后常见的并发症。与非谵妄患者相比,它与发病率增加和手术死亡风险的两倍有关。POD增加了患者在医院的LOS,增加了患者和卫生系统的经济负担。设计:进行系统评价。方法:使用PubMed和MEDLINE数据库检索2010 - 2020年发表的英文文章。遵循系统评价和Meta分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表(NOS)对纳入研究的研究质量和偏倚风险进行评估。结果:最初共筛选了2539份已发表的记录,最终发现10项研究与评价标准相关。6项研究来自美国,其他研究来自韩国、澳大利亚和加拿大。与非谵妄患者相比,POD患者的额外费用从最低1551美元到最高23698美元不等。美国的成本高于其他国家。研究报告称,大多数经历POD的手术患者年龄在70岁或以上,这大大增加了发生POD的风险,增加了LOS和医院相关费用。POD患者与非谵妄患者LOS的差异在0.8 ~ 7.3天之间,如果POD患者处于重症监护状态,LOS的差异会显著增加。结论:大手术后LOS增加和住院费用增加与POD密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perioperative Nursing
Journal of Perioperative Nursing Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信