Development and validation of a new tool (TerHosQual) for assessing service quality in a tertiary care hospital

Q4 Medicine
B. Chandrashekar, Shalini Natarajappa, M. Ravi, P. Nagesh
{"title":"Development and validation of a new tool (TerHosQual) for assessing service quality in a tertiary care hospital","authors":"B. Chandrashekar, Shalini Natarajappa, M. Ravi, P. Nagesh","doi":"10.4103/jms.jms_44_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evaluating service quality (SQ) is an important consideration in the era of ever-increasing inflow of patients through medical tourism. This not only influences the satisfaction of customers but also their purchase intentions. Objective: The objective was to develop and validate a new tool (TerHosQual) for assessing SQ in a tertiary care hospital in Mysore, India. Materials and Methods: Initial tool consisting of 72 items was drafted by synthesizing literature review and inputs from subject experts. The items were segregated into 13 dimensions in consultation with three internal experts. Content validation was done by 12 subject experts. Based on their inputs, 21 items were deleted from the initial tool (8 items for lack of relevance, 6 items for lack of appropriateness, 3 items for lack of clarity of words, and 4 items for redundancy). Response process validity of the final tool consisting of 51 items under 13 dimensions was done using cognitive interview (retrospective verbal probing method). Test–retest reliability assessment was done on ten prospective participants to assess the reliability of the tool before pilot testing the tool on 30 participants. Results: It was found that the Cronbach's alpha if item deleted did not show significant improvement for any of 51 items in the tool as well as for 13 dimensions. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for 51 items in the tool was 0.95 and for 13 dimensions, it was 0.87, indicating a high degree of reliability of the items in the tool under these dimensions. Conclusion: The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of using this new tool in a tertiary care hospital while indicating the reliability of the tool. However, the tool needs to be further evaluated using a larger sample size and factor analysis to validate these results of the pilot study.","PeriodicalId":39636,"journal":{"name":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","volume":"34 1","pages":"17 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jms.jms_44_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating service quality (SQ) is an important consideration in the era of ever-increasing inflow of patients through medical tourism. This not only influences the satisfaction of customers but also their purchase intentions. Objective: The objective was to develop and validate a new tool (TerHosQual) for assessing SQ in a tertiary care hospital in Mysore, India. Materials and Methods: Initial tool consisting of 72 items was drafted by synthesizing literature review and inputs from subject experts. The items were segregated into 13 dimensions in consultation with three internal experts. Content validation was done by 12 subject experts. Based on their inputs, 21 items were deleted from the initial tool (8 items for lack of relevance, 6 items for lack of appropriateness, 3 items for lack of clarity of words, and 4 items for redundancy). Response process validity of the final tool consisting of 51 items under 13 dimensions was done using cognitive interview (retrospective verbal probing method). Test–retest reliability assessment was done on ten prospective participants to assess the reliability of the tool before pilot testing the tool on 30 participants. Results: It was found that the Cronbach's alpha if item deleted did not show significant improvement for any of 51 items in the tool as well as for 13 dimensions. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for 51 items in the tool was 0.95 and for 13 dimensions, it was 0.87, indicating a high degree of reliability of the items in the tool under these dimensions. Conclusion: The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of using this new tool in a tertiary care hospital while indicating the reliability of the tool. However, the tool needs to be further evaluated using a larger sample size and factor analysis to validate these results of the pilot study.
开发和验证用于评估三级保健医院服务质量的新工具(TerHosQual)
背景:在医疗旅游患者不断涌入的时代,评估服务质量是一个重要的考虑因素。这不仅影响顾客的满意度,也影响他们的购买意愿。目的:目的是开发和验证一种新的工具(TerHosQual),用于评估印度迈索尔一家三级护理医院的SQ。材料和方法:通过综合文献综述和学科专家的意见,起草了由72个项目组成的初始工具。与三名内部专家协商后,将这些项目分为13个方面。内容验证由12位主题专家完成。根据他们的输入,从最初的工具中删除了21个项目(8个项目缺乏相关性,6个项目缺乏适当性,3个项目缺乏文字清晰度,4个项目冗余)。使用认知访谈(回顾性言语探究法)对由13个维度下的51个项目组成的最终工具的反应过程有效性进行了测试。在对30名参与者进行试点测试之前,对10名潜在参与者进行了测试-重新测试可靠性评估,以评估该工具的可靠性。结果:研究发现,如果项目被删除,Cronbachα对工具中51个项目中的任何一个以及13个维度都没有显示出显著的改善。该工具中51个项目的Cronbachα系数为0.95,13个维度的Cronbach'sα系数为0.87,表明该工具中的项目在这些维度下具有高度的可靠性。结论:初步研究证明了在三级护理医院使用这种新工具的可行性,同时表明了该工具的可靠性。然而,该工具需要使用更大的样本量和因子分析进行进一步评估,以验证试点研究的这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMS - Journal of Medical Society
JMS - Journal of Medical Society Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信