Improving Comprehension in Written Medical Informed Consent Procedures

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Tanja R. Schatz, J. Haberstroh, Kerstin Bindel, F. Oswald, J. Pantel, Michael A. Paulitsch, N. Konopik, M. Knopf
{"title":"Improving Comprehension in Written Medical Informed Consent Procedures","authors":"Tanja R. Schatz, J. Haberstroh, Kerstin Bindel, F. Oswald, J. Pantel, Michael A. Paulitsch, N. Konopik, M. Knopf","doi":"10.1024/1662-9647/a000169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older adults are frequently required to undergo medical informed consent procedures. This study investigates the influence of four types of written language and visual support (Elaborated Plain Language, Easy-to-Read Language, Standard Version with additional picture, Easy-to-Read-Language with additional picture) on comprehension and affect, compared with the Standard Version alone. In an online survey, n = 87 younger participants aged 26–59 and n = 72 older participants aged 60–81 read a simulation of an informed consent form. Directly after reading it, we used the Understanding dimension of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to ask them about the information presented in the form. The results showed that, by reducing complexity and elaborating the provided information, comprehension of medical information could be improved in the older participant group. In the so-called Elaborated Plain Language groups, the results were the same for younger and older participants. This was not true for the groups that received the Standard Version, on which younger participants performed better. Variations in the language used had no influence on affect. Our conclusion is that Elaborated Plain Language can be recommended for use in medical informed consent procedures with older patients and should be taught to medical professionals.","PeriodicalId":45525,"journal":{"name":"GeroPsych-The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroPsych-The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Older adults are frequently required to undergo medical informed consent procedures. This study investigates the influence of four types of written language and visual support (Elaborated Plain Language, Easy-to-Read Language, Standard Version with additional picture, Easy-to-Read-Language with additional picture) on comprehension and affect, compared with the Standard Version alone. In an online survey, n = 87 younger participants aged 26–59 and n = 72 older participants aged 60–81 read a simulation of an informed consent form. Directly after reading it, we used the Understanding dimension of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to ask them about the information presented in the form. The results showed that, by reducing complexity and elaborating the provided information, comprehension of medical information could be improved in the older participant group. In the so-called Elaborated Plain Language groups, the results were the same for younger and older participants. This was not true for the groups that received the Standard Version, on which younger participants performed better. Variations in the language used had no influence on affect. Our conclusion is that Elaborated Plain Language can be recommended for use in medical informed consent procedures with older patients and should be taught to medical professionals.
提高对书面医疗知情同意程序的理解
老年人经常被要求接受医疗知情同意程序。本研究考察了四种类型的书面语言和视觉支持(阐述平实语言、易读语言、标准版附加图片、易读语言附加图片)对理解和情感的影响,并与标准版单独进行了比较。在一项在线调查中,n = 87名年龄在26-59岁之间的年轻参与者和n = 72名年龄在60-81岁之间的年长参与者阅读了一份模拟的知情同意书。在阅读完之后,我们直接使用麦克阿瑟治疗能力评估工具(MacCAT-T)的理解维度来询问他们关于表格中提供的信息。结果表明,通过降低信息的复杂性和细化所提供的信息,可以提高老年参与者对医疗信息的理解能力。在所谓的“精心设计的通俗语言组”中,年轻人和老年人的结果是一样的。而接受标准版本的小组则不是这样,年轻的参与者表现得更好。所用语言的变化对影响没有影响。我们的结论是,可以推荐在老年患者的医疗知情同意程序中使用详细的通俗语言,并应教授给医疗专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信