Por una ética de la responsabilidad en la alimentación de origen animal: L’animalisme est un anti-humanisme.

IF 0.2 Q3 HISTORY
Sergio Lorenzo Sandoval-Aragón
{"title":"Por una ética de la responsabilidad en la alimentación de origen animal: L’animalisme est un anti-humanisme.","authors":"Sergio Lorenzo Sandoval-Aragón","doi":"10.24836/ES.V31I57.1054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: criticize the “animalist”, “anti-speciesism” and “vegan” social movements, questioning the validity of the conception that their defenders have of their own humanity and of the demonization of the human being. Methodology: The analysis applies two basic analytical principles: against a naive constructivism, it proposes to analyze not only the \"representations\" about the relationships between humans and animals, but also the \"practices\" understood in their materiality. Likewise, according to the Weberian distinction the author adopts an “ethic of responsibility” attentive to practical consequences and not only to abstract considerations of ethical principles, as does the “ethic of conviction”. Starting from these principles, he carries out his analysis based on the history and anthropology of animal domestication and the relationships between humans and animals, on recent statistical data and on a review of contemporary literature, news and legislation. Results: Highlighting the argumentative absurdities and the political and economic risks of the movement under the label of \"animalism.\" Limitations: Although the author refers to a general historical and anthropological knowledge, as well as to some data on an international scale, the study is focused on France. On the other hand, although this does not weaken their arguments, they could give room for a nuance regarding the negative effects, also real, of the excessive production and consumption of meat and poultry, as well as of unregulated fishing, in the world. Conclusions: The author concludes that the animalist movement (along with anti-speciesism and veganism) in France, and by extension in other parts of the world (particularly the United States of America), that tends to gain more and more followers and influence in legislative debates, represents a political danger that could have disastrous consequences for human health and for the economy of many countries.","PeriodicalId":41554,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Sociales-Revista Universitaria Semestral","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Sociales-Revista Universitaria Semestral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24836/ES.V31I57.1054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: criticize the “animalist”, “anti-speciesism” and “vegan” social movements, questioning the validity of the conception that their defenders have of their own humanity and of the demonization of the human being. Methodology: The analysis applies two basic analytical principles: against a naive constructivism, it proposes to analyze not only the "representations" about the relationships between humans and animals, but also the "practices" understood in their materiality. Likewise, according to the Weberian distinction the author adopts an “ethic of responsibility” attentive to practical consequences and not only to abstract considerations of ethical principles, as does the “ethic of conviction”. Starting from these principles, he carries out his analysis based on the history and anthropology of animal domestication and the relationships between humans and animals, on recent statistical data and on a review of contemporary literature, news and legislation. Results: Highlighting the argumentative absurdities and the political and economic risks of the movement under the label of "animalism." Limitations: Although the author refers to a general historical and anthropological knowledge, as well as to some data on an international scale, the study is focused on France. On the other hand, although this does not weaken their arguments, they could give room for a nuance regarding the negative effects, also real, of the excessive production and consumption of meat and poultry, as well as of unregulated fishing, in the world. Conclusions: The author concludes that the animalist movement (along with anti-speciesism and veganism) in France, and by extension in other parts of the world (particularly the United States of America), that tends to gain more and more followers and influence in legislative debates, represents a political danger that could have disastrous consequences for human health and for the economy of many countries.
对于动物源性喂养的责任伦理:动物主义是一种反人道主义。
目的:批评“动物主义者”,“反物种主义”和“纯素食主义者”的社会运动,质疑他们的捍卫者对自己的人性和对人类的妖魔化的概念的有效性。方法论:分析运用了两个基本的分析原则:反对朴素的建构主义,它提出不仅要分析关于人与动物关系的“表征”,而且要分析在其物质性中被理解的“实践”。同样,根据韦伯的区分,作者采用了一种关注实际后果的“责任伦理”,而不仅仅是对伦理原则的抽象考虑,就像“信念伦理”一样。从这些原则出发,他根据动物驯化的历史和人类学以及人与动物之间的关系,根据最近的统计数据以及对当代文学、新闻和立法的回顾进行了分析。结果:在“动物主义”的标签下,突出论证的荒谬和运动的政治和经济风险。局限性:虽然作者参考了一般的历史和人类学知识,以及一些国际范围的数据,但研究主要集中在法国。另一方面,虽然这并不削弱他们的论点,但他们可以在世界上肉类和家禽的过度生产和消费以及无管制捕捞的负面影响方面给予细微差别的余地。结论:提交人的结论是,法国以及世界其他地区(特别是美利坚合众国)的动物保护运动(连同反物种主义和纯素食主义)趋向于获得越来越多的追随者并在立法辩论中产生影响,这代表了一种政治危险,可能对人类健康和许多国家的经济造成灾难性后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信