Predicting successful weaning in patients treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905068.2020.1728881
Tayseer M. Zayton, E. El-reweny, H. Tammam, K. M. Gharbeya
{"title":"Predicting successful weaning in patients treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation","authors":"Tayseer M. Zayton, E. El-reweny, H. Tammam, K. M. Gharbeya","doi":"10.1080/20905068.2020.1728881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Increasing use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory failure may increase resource requirements and hospital costs. Prediction of successful weaning in these patients may improve resource use and patients outcome. The Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score has been proposed as an outcome prediction tool for patients undergoing venovenous (VV-ECMO). However, it was developed and validated on patients established on ECMO. This may limit its usefulness as an adjunct tool for decision-making process at the pre-ECMO stage. Aim: The aim of the work was to assess the efficacy of RESP score as a tool to predict successful weaning in patients treated with VV-ECMO before initiation of treatment. Patients and methods: The study was carried out on 23 adult patients who were admitted to the units of Critical Care Medicine Departments in Egyptian Armed Forces Hospitals within 1 year and were treated with VV-ECMO; all of them received the same treatment as recommended by ELSO guidelines for adult respiratory failure. They were classified into two groups according to ECMO weaning successfulness at the end of the study: group I (successful weaning) and group II (failed weaning). Complete physical assessment, laboratory investigations, and RESP score calculation were done before ECMO initiation. Results: Pre-ECMO RESP score, in group I it ranged from −8 to 7 (mean 1.75 ± 3.65), while in group II it ranged from −11 to 1 (mean −6.38 ± 1.88), there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0. 003). The ROC curve of RESP score showed an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.658–0.981) (p < 0.001). The best cutoff value was −1, at that level the sensitivity was 69.7%, specificity was 81.5%. Calculated positive predictive value of RESP score was 88.9% while negative predictive value was 63.6%. Conclusion: RESP score may be effective tool to predict ECMO weaning successfulness before initiation of ECMO.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20905068.2020.1728881","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905068.2020.1728881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Increasing use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory failure may increase resource requirements and hospital costs. Prediction of successful weaning in these patients may improve resource use and patients outcome. The Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score has been proposed as an outcome prediction tool for patients undergoing venovenous (VV-ECMO). However, it was developed and validated on patients established on ECMO. This may limit its usefulness as an adjunct tool for decision-making process at the pre-ECMO stage. Aim: The aim of the work was to assess the efficacy of RESP score as a tool to predict successful weaning in patients treated with VV-ECMO before initiation of treatment. Patients and methods: The study was carried out on 23 adult patients who were admitted to the units of Critical Care Medicine Departments in Egyptian Armed Forces Hospitals within 1 year and were treated with VV-ECMO; all of them received the same treatment as recommended by ELSO guidelines for adult respiratory failure. They were classified into two groups according to ECMO weaning successfulness at the end of the study: group I (successful weaning) and group II (failed weaning). Complete physical assessment, laboratory investigations, and RESP score calculation were done before ECMO initiation. Results: Pre-ECMO RESP score, in group I it ranged from −8 to 7 (mean 1.75 ± 3.65), while in group II it ranged from −11 to 1 (mean −6.38 ± 1.88), there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0. 003). The ROC curve of RESP score showed an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.658–0.981) (p < 0.001). The best cutoff value was −1, at that level the sensitivity was 69.7%, specificity was 81.5%. Calculated positive predictive value of RESP score was 88.9% while negative predictive value was 63.6%. Conclusion: RESP score may be effective tool to predict ECMO weaning successfulness before initiation of ECMO.
分享
查看原文
预测静脉-静脉体外膜氧合治疗患者成功脱机
摘要简介:增加体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗急性呼吸衰竭可能会增加资源需求和医院成本。预测这些患者成功断奶可能会提高资源利用率和患者预后。呼吸ECMO生存预测(RESP)评分已被提议作为静脉-静脉(VV-ECMO)患者的结果预测工具。然而,它是在使用ECMO的患者身上开发和验证的。这可能会限制其作为ECMO前阶段决策过程的辅助工具的有用性。目的:这项工作的目的是评估RESP评分作为预测VV-ECMO患者在开始治疗前成功断奶的工具的有效性。患者和方法:对23名在1年内入住埃及武装部队医院重症医学科并接受VV-ECMO治疗的成年患者进行研究;他们都接受了ELSO指南推荐的成人呼吸衰竭治疗。根据研究结束时ECMO断奶成功率,他们被分为两组:第一组(成功断奶)和第二组(断奶失败)。在ECMO启动前进行完整的身体评估、实验室调查和RESP评分计算。结果:ECMO前RESP评分,第一组为−8至7(平均1.75±3.65),第二组为−11至1(平均−6.38±1.88),两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0。003)。RESP评分ROC曲线的AUC为0.880(95%CI 0.658-0.981)(p<0.001)。最佳截断值为−1,在此水平下,敏感性为69.7%,特异性为81.5%。RESP评分的阳性预测值为88.9%,阴性预测值为63.6%。结论:RESP评分可能是预测ECMO开始前ECMO断奶成功率的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信