Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Teicoplanin among Chinese Patients with Gram-Positive Infections in a Tertiary Hospital

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1155/2023/2681979

Yuan-Yuan Li, Guanxuanzi Zhang, Jin Wang, N. Bai, Yun Cai

{"title":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Teicoplanin among Chinese Patients with Gram-Positive Infections in a Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Yuan-Yuan Li, Guanxuanzi Zhang, Jin Wang, N. Bai, Yun Cai","doi":"10.1155/2023/2681979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. To explore the use of teicoplanin among Chinese patients with Gram-positive infections in a tertiary hospital. Methods. The medical records of patients, who were monitored for teicoplanin plasma concentration (TPC) from December 2017 to February 2019, were collected. By combining the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and nonlinear mixed-effects model, a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of teicoplanin was established. Results. The proportions of TPCs lower and higher than 10 mg/L were nearly the same (102 vs. 108 cases). A two-compartment model of teicoplanin PPK in Chinese patients was established. Compared with 400 mg, the 600 mg regimen was more able to reach the target concentration (10 mg/L), especially for high-weight patients. Conclusions. The standard regimen of teicoplanin, 400 mg, failed to reach the target value in the present population. Moreover, the 600 mg regimen was feasible for high-weight patients based on TDM and individualized pharmacokinetic dosing adjustment.","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2681979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. To explore the use of teicoplanin among Chinese patients with Gram-positive infections in a tertiary hospital. Methods. The medical records of patients, who were monitored for teicoplanin plasma concentration (TPC) from December 2017 to February 2019, were collected. By combining the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and nonlinear mixed-effects model, a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of teicoplanin was established. Results. The proportions of TPCs lower and higher than 10 mg/L were nearly the same (102 vs. 108 cases). A two-compartment model of teicoplanin PPK in Chinese patients was established. Compared with 400 mg, the 600 mg regimen was more able to reach the target concentration (10 mg/L), especially for high-weight patients. Conclusions. The standard regimen of teicoplanin, 400 mg, failed to reach the target value in the present population. Moreover, the 600 mg regimen was feasible for high-weight patients based on TDM and individualized pharmacokinetic dosing adjustment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

某三级医院革兰氏阳性感染患者Teicoplanin治疗药物监测及人群药动学分析

背景。目的探讨某三级医院革兰氏阳性感染患者对替可普兰的使用情况。方法。收集2017年12月至2019年2月对患者进行替柯planin血药浓度(TPC)监测的病历。将治疗药物监测(TDM)与非线性混合效应模型相结合，建立了替柯planin的群体药代动力学(PPK)模型。结果。TPCs低于10 mg/L和高于10 mg/L的比例几乎相同(102例对108例)。建立中国患者替可普兰蛋白PPK的双室模型。与400 mg相比，600 mg方案更能达到目标浓度(10 mg/L)，特别是对于高体重患者。结论。在目前的人群中，400mg的teicoplanin标准方案未能达到目标值。此外，基于TDM和个体化药代动力学剂量调整，600 mg方案对于高体重患者是可行的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 医学-药学

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

5.00%

发文量

226

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.