“Our Pain Makes Us Family”: March For Our Lives and the constitutive role of gun violence trauma in youth publics

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Kelly E Jensen
{"title":"“Our Pain Makes Us Family”: March For Our Lives and the constitutive role of gun violence trauma in youth publics","authors":"Kelly E Jensen","doi":"10.1177/20570473231186839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the dynamics of diverse youth public formation through analysis of the 20 student speeches delivered at the 2018 March For Our Lives rally. I argue that the collective identification as youth survivors of gun violence trauma functions to constitute this diverse youth public. I trace how the speakers’ shared gun violence trauma enabled them to form a racially integrated coalition while not discrediting their differently positioned identities and disparate gun violence experiences. In doing so, I forward a conceptualization of how youth publics negotiate gun violence trauma, asserting that youth publics are characterized by both present constraints and a future-oriented agency, members of youth publics must account for tensions across racial differences in their gun violence prevention advocacy, and gun violence trauma functions as a shared basis for political participation. My analysis of the students’ gun violence prevention discourse complicates this framework to reveal how gun violence trauma as a shared basis for youth public membership threatens their source of empowerment: ownership over their futures. Contributing to scholarship on the formation of publics, this essay demonstrates the significance of youth publics at the intersections of race, trauma, and gun violence.","PeriodicalId":44233,"journal":{"name":"Communication and the Public","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and the Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231186839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examines the dynamics of diverse youth public formation through analysis of the 20 student speeches delivered at the 2018 March For Our Lives rally. I argue that the collective identification as youth survivors of gun violence trauma functions to constitute this diverse youth public. I trace how the speakers’ shared gun violence trauma enabled them to form a racially integrated coalition while not discrediting their differently positioned identities and disparate gun violence experiences. In doing so, I forward a conceptualization of how youth publics negotiate gun violence trauma, asserting that youth publics are characterized by both present constraints and a future-oriented agency, members of youth publics must account for tensions across racial differences in their gun violence prevention advocacy, and gun violence trauma functions as a shared basis for political participation. My analysis of the students’ gun violence prevention discourse complicates this framework to reveal how gun violence trauma as a shared basis for youth public membership threatens their source of empowerment: ownership over their futures. Contributing to scholarship on the formation of publics, this essay demonstrates the significance of youth publics at the intersections of race, trauma, and gun violence.
“我们的痛苦使我们成为家庭”:为我们的生命游行和枪支暴力创伤在青年公众中的构成作用
本文通过分析2018年“为我们的生活游行”集会上发表的20篇学生演讲,探讨了青年公众多元化的动态。我认为,作为枪支暴力创伤的青年幸存者的集体认同,构成了这个多元化的青年公众。我追溯了演讲者共同的枪支暴力创伤是如何使他们能够组成一个种族融合的联盟,同时又不诋毁他们不同的身份和不同的枪支暴力经历的。在这样做的过程中,我提出了一个关于青年公众如何应对枪支暴力创伤的概念,声称青年公众的特点是既有当前的制约因素,又有面向未来的机构,青年公众成员在预防枪支暴力的宣传中必须考虑到种族差异的紧张关系,枪支暴力创伤是政治参与的共同基础。我对学生枪支暴力预防话语的分析使这一框架变得复杂,以揭示枪支暴力创伤作为青年公众成员的共同基础是如何威胁他们的赋权来源的:对他们未来的所有权。本文展示了青年公众在种族、创伤和枪支暴力的交叉点上的意义,为公众形成的学术研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信