{"title":"ARASsort: A new sorting based multiple attribute decision-making algorithm","authors":"Sait Gül","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) tools can effectively support the decision analysts in selecting the best alternative among many, ranking the alternatives in decreasing or increasing order of preference, or allocating the alternatives into pre-defined ordered classes/categories. Even though the literature provides the analyst with precious sorting-based MADM tools such as PROMSORT, UTADIS, AHPSort, TOPSISsort, and so forth, the majority of the methods can be found complex and hard to be understood by the researchers and practitioners who are not familiar with the mathematical notions and computations of MADM (distance calculation, threshold and preference function determination, and so on). To provide a simpler but powerful MADM tool aiming at sorting the alternatives into classes, this study proposes a sorting-based additive ratio assessment algorithm which is called ARASsort. For limiting (interval-based) and central (reference-based) profiles describing the categories, we have developed two algorithms: ARASsort-lp and ARASsort-cp, respectively. Their applicability was shown in two examples: green supplier evaluation and economic freedom evaluation of countries. The validity of algorithms was presented by demonstrating the class assignment similarities between the results obtained by ARASsort, VIKORsort, and TOPSISsort. The findings show that ARASsort works well because it shows a higher level of class assignment similarities with the other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"30 3-4","pages":"93-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) tools can effectively support the decision analysts in selecting the best alternative among many, ranking the alternatives in decreasing or increasing order of preference, or allocating the alternatives into pre-defined ordered classes/categories. Even though the literature provides the analyst with precious sorting-based MADM tools such as PROMSORT, UTADIS, AHPSort, TOPSISsort, and so forth, the majority of the methods can be found complex and hard to be understood by the researchers and practitioners who are not familiar with the mathematical notions and computations of MADM (distance calculation, threshold and preference function determination, and so on). To provide a simpler but powerful MADM tool aiming at sorting the alternatives into classes, this study proposes a sorting-based additive ratio assessment algorithm which is called ARASsort. For limiting (interval-based) and central (reference-based) profiles describing the categories, we have developed two algorithms: ARASsort-lp and ARASsort-cp, respectively. Their applicability was shown in two examples: green supplier evaluation and economic freedom evaluation of countries. The validity of algorithms was presented by demonstrating the class assignment similarities between the results obtained by ARASsort, VIKORsort, and TOPSISsort. The findings show that ARASsort works well because it shows a higher level of class assignment similarities with the other methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.