Does Regulatory Reform of Internal Controls in China Improve Internal Control Effectiveness? Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yi‐Hung Lin, Ting‐Chiao Huang
{"title":"Does Regulatory Reform of Internal Controls in China Improve Internal Control Effectiveness? Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement","authors":"Yi‐Hung Lin, Ting‐Chiao Huang","doi":"10.2308/jiar-2021-044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The regulatory reform of internal controls (ICs) in China mandates that certain firms incorporate corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement into ICs and issue IC reports. Using a staggered difference-in-differences research design, we find that IC effectiveness has worsened following this reform, but this deterioration is partially mitigated when mandated firms report their CSR engagement. Additional analyses demonstrate that this deterioration is further lessened when CSR reports are prepared in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative reporting guidelines or assured by external auditors and when firms spend more on CSR activities. Finally, cross-sectional analyses suggest that CSR engagement mitigates the deterioration in IC effectiveness more in non–state-owned enterprises and in firms that have better financial performance, lack political connections, or are located in regions with higher market development or social trust.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\n JEL Classifications: M4; M48.","PeriodicalId":45457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2021-044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regulatory reform of internal controls (ICs) in China mandates that certain firms incorporate corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement into ICs and issue IC reports. Using a staggered difference-in-differences research design, we find that IC effectiveness has worsened following this reform, but this deterioration is partially mitigated when mandated firms report their CSR engagement. Additional analyses demonstrate that this deterioration is further lessened when CSR reports are prepared in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative reporting guidelines or assured by external auditors and when firms spend more on CSR activities. Finally, cross-sectional analyses suggest that CSR engagement mitigates the deterioration in IC effectiveness more in non–state-owned enterprises and in firms that have better financial performance, lack political connections, or are located in regions with higher market development or social trust. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M4; M48.
中国内部控制监管改革是否提高了内部控制有效性?企业社会责任参与的作用
中国的内部控制监管改革要求某些公司将企业社会责任(CSR)参与纳入内部控制,并发布内部控制报告。采用交错差异中差异研究设计,我们发现,在这一改革之后,内部集成企业的有效性有所恶化,但当被授权企业报告其企业社会责任参与情况时,这种恶化得到了部分缓解。进一步的分析表明,如果企业社会责任报告是按照全球报告倡议组织的报告准则编写的,或者得到外部审计师的保证,以及企业在企业社会责任活动上投入更多的资金,这种恶化会进一步减轻。最后,横断面分析表明,非国有企业、财务绩效较好、缺乏政治关系或位于市场发展程度或社会信任度较高的地区的企业,企业社会责任参与更能缓解企业内部集成效率的恶化。数据可用性:数据可从文本中引用的公共来源获得。JEL分类:M4;M48。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信