Assessment of Educational Service Quality Gap: The Students’ Perspectives

M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami
{"title":"Assessment of Educational Service Quality Gap: The Students’ Perspectives","authors":"M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami","doi":"10.5812/erms.80246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.80246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.
教育服务质量差距评估:学生视角
背景:无需强调教育服务的重要性,也无需强调社会算法的重要性。属性培训和学生满意度有助于系统的提升和最终的社会发展。本研究旨在评估加兹温医科大学(QUMS)的教育服务质量。方法:采用简单随机抽样的方法,于2014年对327名QUMS学生进行横断面调查。最重要的变量是教育服务质量的有形性、保证性、同理心、可靠性和问责制。数据是使用SERVQUAL的27项问卷收集的。使用Cronbachα评分(α=0.88)和测试-再测试(R=0.83)方法来确定问卷的可靠性。结果:学生的平均年龄为22.2±3.1岁。教育服务质量得分分别为1.62、-1.70、-1.52、-1.31和-1.15,基于学生的认知,平均教育服务质量得分为-1.38(P<0.001)。学生的认知和期望与性别之间没有明显的关系(P>0.05)。政策制定者的更多关注似乎提高了教育服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信