From Recovery in Mental Health to Recovery in General Practice: Contributionof Service Users and their Relatives to the Revision of the WHO InternationalClassification of Diseases

J. Francois
{"title":"From Recovery in Mental Health to Recovery in General Practice: Contributionof Service Users and their Relatives to the Revision of the WHO InternationalClassification of Diseases","authors":"J. Francois","doi":"10.4172/2329-9126.1000289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to contribute to the revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) by exploring how mental health service users and their relatives conceive the influence of the contextual factors, as described in Chap. 21 of the ICD-10, on a) the onset of a mental or behavioral disorder; b) the resurgence of such a disorder; and c) the recovery process. In individual and group interviews, the 18 main categories of contextual factors proposed by the ICD-11 (beta draft) were discussed through the Contextual Factors Questionnaire (CFQ). Participants in individual interviews (N=28) completed the CFQ. Among the three dimensions, it was for the recovery process that the contextual factors were considered to be the most influential, followed by their influence on the resurgence of a mental or behavioral disorder and then by the influence on the onset of that disorder. The most influential factor for a single dimension was that of ‘interventions’ on the recovery process, whereas the ‘social or cultural factors’ are the most influential ones for all dimensions combined, closely followed, at par, by ‘risk factors’ and ‘interpersonal relations’. As recovery is also dependent upon health services and interventions globally, this paper suggests that these could be more effective if they were recovery-oriented and with recovery as a common overarching goal for mental as well as for physical healthcare provision and thus for global recovery. However, further work is needed to validate its reliability for enhanced mental and physical health parity in general practice.","PeriodicalId":90594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9126.1000289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to contribute to the revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) by exploring how mental health service users and their relatives conceive the influence of the contextual factors, as described in Chap. 21 of the ICD-10, on a) the onset of a mental or behavioral disorder; b) the resurgence of such a disorder; and c) the recovery process. In individual and group interviews, the 18 main categories of contextual factors proposed by the ICD-11 (beta draft) were discussed through the Contextual Factors Questionnaire (CFQ). Participants in individual interviews (N=28) completed the CFQ. Among the three dimensions, it was for the recovery process that the contextual factors were considered to be the most influential, followed by their influence on the resurgence of a mental or behavioral disorder and then by the influence on the onset of that disorder. The most influential factor for a single dimension was that of ‘interventions’ on the recovery process, whereas the ‘social or cultural factors’ are the most influential ones for all dimensions combined, closely followed, at par, by ‘risk factors’ and ‘interpersonal relations’. As recovery is also dependent upon health services and interventions globally, this paper suggests that these could be more effective if they were recovery-oriented and with recovery as a common overarching goal for mental as well as for physical healthcare provision and thus for global recovery. However, further work is needed to validate its reliability for enhanced mental and physical health parity in general practice.
从心理健康康复到全科医学康复:服务使用者及其亲属对世界卫生组织国际疾病分类修订的贡献
本研究的目的是通过探索心理健康服务使用者及其亲属如何理解情境因素对国际疾病分类(ICD-10)的影响,为国际疾病分类的修订做出贡献,如ICD-10第21章所述,a)精神或行为障碍的发作;b) 这种混乱的死灰复燃;以及c)回收过程。在个人和小组访谈中,通过情境因素问卷(CFQ)讨论了ICD-11(测试版草案)提出的18个主要类别的情境因素。个体访谈的参与者(N=28)完成了CFQ。在这三个维度中,对于恢复过程,上下文因素被认为是最具影响力的,其次是它们对精神或行为障碍复发的影响,然后是对该障碍发作的影响。单一维度最具影响力的因素是对恢复过程的“干预”,而“社会或文化因素”是所有维度最具影响的因素,其次是“风险因素”和“人际关系”。由于康复也依赖于全球范围内的医疗服务和干预措施,本文认为,如果以康复为导向,并将康复作为心理和身体健康服务的共同总体目标,从而实现全球康复,这些服务和干预可能会更有效。然而,还需要进一步的工作来验证其在全科医学中增强身心健康均等的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书