The survival of artefacts from different historical phases in shallow open sites and the need for spit excavations: An overview from the Cumberland Plain, Western Sydney, Australia

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
B. White
{"title":"The survival of artefacts from different historical phases in shallow open sites and the need for spit excavations: An overview from the Cumberland Plain, Western Sydney, Australia","authors":"B. White","doi":"10.1080/03122417.2021.1925415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It has often been thought that shallow open sites (<50 cm of artefact-bearing deposit) in the undulating landscape of the Cumberland Plain would not retain any chronologically meaningful vertical distributions. The prevailing geomorphic model has proposed that artefacts discarded by people at different times would have been buried and mixed together by bioturbation. To address this model, this paper analyses the vertical distributions of artefacts at 21 open sites and finds that 13 of those sites show vertical variation in the proportions of indurated mudstone/silicified tuff (IMST), silcrete and/or quartz artefacts. The trends shown by the distributions are broadly consistent with a known regional change in raw material use and indicate the survival of some chronologically meaningful artefact variation with depth of the deposit. In addition, sites with increased proportions of older IMST artefacts in deeper deposits tend to be associated with larger streams and tend to occur at low elevations. This suggests that the survival of older artefacts could be related in part to long-term geomorphic processes visible at the landscape scale. The results indicate that sites may have differing histories of visitation, artefact discard, geomorphic processes and survival of evidence, and that careful, stratigraphic excavation is warranted.","PeriodicalId":8648,"journal":{"name":"Australian Archaeology","volume":"87 1","pages":"179 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03122417.2021.1925415","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2021.1925415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract It has often been thought that shallow open sites (<50 cm of artefact-bearing deposit) in the undulating landscape of the Cumberland Plain would not retain any chronologically meaningful vertical distributions. The prevailing geomorphic model has proposed that artefacts discarded by people at different times would have been buried and mixed together by bioturbation. To address this model, this paper analyses the vertical distributions of artefacts at 21 open sites and finds that 13 of those sites show vertical variation in the proportions of indurated mudstone/silicified tuff (IMST), silcrete and/or quartz artefacts. The trends shown by the distributions are broadly consistent with a known regional change in raw material use and indicate the survival of some chronologically meaningful artefact variation with depth of the deposit. In addition, sites with increased proportions of older IMST artefacts in deeper deposits tend to be associated with larger streams and tend to occur at low elevations. This suggests that the survival of older artefacts could be related in part to long-term geomorphic processes visible at the landscape scale. The results indicate that sites may have differing histories of visitation, artefact discard, geomorphic processes and survival of evidence, and that careful, stratigraphic excavation is warranted.
浅层开放遗址中不同历史阶段的人工制品的生存和吐槽挖掘的需要:澳大利亚西悉尼坎伯兰平原的概况
人们通常认为,坎伯兰平原起伏景观中的浅层开放遗址(小于50厘米的含人工制品沉积物)不会保留任何有年代意义的垂直分布。流行的地貌学模型认为,在不同时期被人们丢弃的人工制品可能被生物扰动掩埋并混合在一起。为了解决这一模型,本文分析了21个开放遗址的人工制品的垂直分布,发现其中13个遗址的硬化泥岩/硅化凝灰岩(IMST)、硅结砾岩和/或石英人工制品的比例在垂直方向上存在变化。分布所显示的趋势与已知的原材料使用的区域变化大致一致,并表明一些有意义的人工制品随沉积物深度的变化而存在。此外,较深沉积物中较古老IMST人工制品比例增加的地点往往与较大的溪流有关,并且往往发生在低海拔地区。这表明,较古老的人工制品的幸存可能部分与景观尺度上可见的长期地貌过程有关。结果表明,这些遗址可能有不同的参观历史、人工制品的丢弃、地貌过程和证据的保存,因此有必要进行仔细的地层挖掘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信