Optimisation of check-in process focused on passenger perception for using self-service technologies at airport in Australia

S. Tyagi, G. Lodewijks
{"title":"Optimisation of check-in process focused on passenger perception for using self-service technologies at airport in Australia","authors":"S. Tyagi, G. Lodewijks","doi":"10.3926/jairm.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The use of technology is constantly evolving for various services at airports to enhance the passenger experience. However, the passenger’s perspective towards the technology is different.Design/methodology: A survey was conducted to know these perspectives and finding the differences. The collected data was based on the passengers at Australian airports. The CAST software was used to analyse the simulation model.Findings: The collected survey helped in identifying three types of passengers: the number of passengers who prefer traditional service, the number of passengers who prefer technology-based services and the number of passengers who prefer technology-based services only under the specific circumstances such as less crowded and less processing time. Each type of passenger was further analysed based on their provided arriving time at terminal and processing time for check-in to evaluate the impact on waiting time.Practical implications: The findings suggest only that only one third passengers prefer technology-based services at airports and presents the resulting impact on the waiting time at check-in facilities.Originality/value: Given the current rate of technological innovations at airports, the findings provide insights for check-in facilities management at airports.","PeriodicalId":30504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Airline and Airport Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Airline and Airport Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3926/jairm.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: The use of technology is constantly evolving for various services at airports to enhance the passenger experience. However, the passenger’s perspective towards the technology is different.Design/methodology: A survey was conducted to know these perspectives and finding the differences. The collected data was based on the passengers at Australian airports. The CAST software was used to analyse the simulation model.Findings: The collected survey helped in identifying three types of passengers: the number of passengers who prefer traditional service, the number of passengers who prefer technology-based services and the number of passengers who prefer technology-based services only under the specific circumstances such as less crowded and less processing time. Each type of passenger was further analysed based on their provided arriving time at terminal and processing time for check-in to evaluate the impact on waiting time.Practical implications: The findings suggest only that only one third passengers prefer technology-based services at airports and presents the resulting impact on the waiting time at check-in facilities.Originality/value: Given the current rate of technological innovations at airports, the findings provide insights for check-in facilities management at airports.
优化办理登机手续的流程,重点关注乘客在澳大利亚机场使用自助服务技术的感受
目的:在机场的各项服务中,科技的应用不断发展,以提升乘客的体验。然而,乘客对这项技术的看法却有所不同。设计/方法:我们进行了一项调查,以了解这些观点并发现差异。收集的数据是基于澳大利亚机场的乘客。利用CAST软件对仿真模型进行分析。调查结果:收集的调查有助厘清三种乘客类型:偏好传统服务的乘客人数、偏好科技服务的乘客人数,以及只在较不拥挤及处理时间较短等特定情况下偏好科技服务的乘客人数。我们进一步分析每一类旅客的到达时间和办理登机手续的时间,以评估对等候时间的影响。实际意义:研究结果表明,只有三分之一的乘客更喜欢机场的技术服务,并由此对值机设施的等待时间产生了影响。原创性/价值:考虑到目前机场技术创新的速度,研究结果为机场值机设施管理提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信