Local planning cultures? What Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto planners say

IF 1.7 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

International Planning Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1080/13563475.2022.2043148

J. Jackson

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper centres on what 51 planning practitioners working across the metropolises of Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto said in open-ended interviews about themselves and their work under current neoliberal policy settings. Planning systems were redesigned under these settings to attract inward investment more readily, local planners’ practices to be compliant. Through an interrogation of interview transcripts, the aim here to discern whether older professional values underlie current practices and what degree of influence, if any, they have. It is concluded they do, albeit in limited ways, their influence on planning practices varying between and within the three metropolises. Reasons why are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

当地规划文化？格拉斯哥、墨尔本和多伦多的规划者怎么说

摘要本文以在格拉斯哥、墨尔本和多伦多大都市工作的51名规划从业者在开放式采访中对自己和他们在当前新自由主义政策环境下的工作所说的话为中心。在这些环境下重新设计了规划系统，以更容易地吸引外来投资，符合当地规划者的做法。通过对面试记录的询问，我们的目的是了解当前做法背后是否有旧的职业价值观，以及它们的影响力（如果有的话）。得出的结论是，尽管在有限的方面，它们对规划实践的影响在三个大都市之间和内部各不相同。讨论了原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Planning Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

4.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning, at urban, regional, national and international levels, faces new challenges, notably those related to the growth of globalisation as both an objective socio-economic process and a shift in policy-maker perceptions and modes of analysis. International Planning Studies (IPS) addresses these issues by publishing quality research in a variety of specific fields and from a range of theoretical and normative perspectives, which helps improve understanding of the actual and potential role of planning and planners in this context.