Research As Mission: Experiences and Expectations of Missions Agency Leadership Regarding the Ministry Role of Clinical and Public Health Research

Q4 Medicine
C. Wendler, Doug Lindberg, Greg Sund
{"title":"Research As Mission: Experiences and Expectations of Missions Agency Leadership Regarding the Ministry Role of Clinical and Public Health Research","authors":"C. Wendler, Doug Lindberg, Greg Sund","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Research as a focus of healthcare missions is an important component of the evolving role of healthcare missionaries and sending organizations in LMICs.  There is a lack of data and understanding on what appetite exists to expand and invest in such research initiatives.  \nMethods: This study surveyed leaders of North American mission sending agencies engaged in healthcare, seeking to ascertain their current and anticipated future involvement in research, education, and healthcare delivery.  \nResults: Forty-seven leaders responded (of 211 contacted) to our survey of whom 37 completed all survey questions.  Eighty-two percent of respondents agreed that they had a responsibility as an organization to study how to improve clinical care and public health.  Sixty-four percent of respondents anticipated reduced healthcare delivery in the next 10 years.  During that same 10-year, time frame, 61% anticipate an increase in health research mentoring, and 79% expect an increased role of student education.  However, this emerging shift towards research and education is not yet reflected with a similar degree of perceived enthusiasm among missionaries in doing research or donors in supporting it. \nDiscussion: Across the spectrum of middle- and upper-level leadership in a variety of missions sending organizations, there is recognition of an important and increasing role for healthcare research activities in ministry.  About half of the agencies represented in our sample are already involved in research and will need to share best practices with others as healthcare missionaries devote more time and attention to research mentorship.  Done well, this can provide additional avenues for disciple-making in both home and host cultures as well as improve the care for populations in those remote and rural areas often most served by healthcare missionaries. \nConclusion: Research as mission has, heretofore, been a neglected methodology, but institutional leaders in healthcare missions anticipate an increasingly important ministry role for it.","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research as a focus of healthcare missions is an important component of the evolving role of healthcare missionaries and sending organizations in LMICs.  There is a lack of data and understanding on what appetite exists to expand and invest in such research initiatives.  Methods: This study surveyed leaders of North American mission sending agencies engaged in healthcare, seeking to ascertain their current and anticipated future involvement in research, education, and healthcare delivery.  Results: Forty-seven leaders responded (of 211 contacted) to our survey of whom 37 completed all survey questions.  Eighty-two percent of respondents agreed that they had a responsibility as an organization to study how to improve clinical care and public health.  Sixty-four percent of respondents anticipated reduced healthcare delivery in the next 10 years.  During that same 10-year, time frame, 61% anticipate an increase in health research mentoring, and 79% expect an increased role of student education.  However, this emerging shift towards research and education is not yet reflected with a similar degree of perceived enthusiasm among missionaries in doing research or donors in supporting it. Discussion: Across the spectrum of middle- and upper-level leadership in a variety of missions sending organizations, there is recognition of an important and increasing role for healthcare research activities in ministry.  About half of the agencies represented in our sample are already involved in research and will need to share best practices with others as healthcare missionaries devote more time and attention to research mentorship.  Done well, this can provide additional avenues for disciple-making in both home and host cultures as well as improve the care for populations in those remote and rural areas often most served by healthcare missionaries. Conclusion: Research as mission has, heretofore, been a neglected methodology, but institutional leaders in healthcare missions anticipate an increasingly important ministry role for it.
作为使命的研究:使命机构领导对临床和公共卫生研究部作用的经验和期望
简介:研究作为医疗保健任务的重点是医疗保健传教士和派遣组织在中低收入国家不断发展的作用的重要组成部分。对于扩大和投资此类研究计划的意愿有多大,目前缺乏数据和理解。方法:本研究调查了从事医疗保健的北美传教机构的领导人,试图确定他们目前和未来在研究、教育和医疗保健服务方面的参与情况。结果:47位领导对我们的调查做出了回应(在211位联系的领导中),其中37位完成了所有调查问题。82%的受访者同意,作为一个组织,他们有责任研究如何改善临床护理和公共卫生。64%的受访者预计未来10年医疗保健服务将减少。在同样的10年时间框架内,61%的人预计卫生研究指导会增加,79%的人预计学生教育的作用会增加。然而,这种向研究和教育的转变还没有反映在传教士进行研究或捐助者支持研究的同样程度的热情上。讨论:在各种任务派遣组织的中高层领导中,人们认识到医疗保健研究活动在部委中的重要和日益重要的作用。在我们的样本中,大约有一半的机构已经参与了研究,并且需要与其他机构分享最佳实践,因为医疗传教士在研究指导上投入了更多的时间和精力。如果做得好,这可以为家庭和东道国文化中的门徒培养提供额外的途径,并改善对那些通常由保健传教士服务的偏远和农村地区人口的护理。结论:研究作为使命,迄今为止,一直是一个被忽视的方法,但机构领导人在医疗保健使命预期一个日益重要的部的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信