{"title":"Class and Complex Transmedia Character in the Early Victorian Period: Jack Sheppard (1839-40)","authors":"Erica Haugtvedt","doi":"10.46911/oyym7051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reception of William Harrison Ainsworth’s novel, Jack Sheppard (1839-1840), was contemporaneously deemed a mania and has been described by critics today as a moral panic over the influence of fiction. Several adaptations of Ainsworth’s novel across media ambiguously depict Jack’s hanging, and the adaptations that most clearly show his survival occur in those versions that are least legally defensible and most clearly targeted toward the labouring classes. In this essay, I analyse Buckstone and Greenwood’s melodramas at the Adelphi and Sadler’s Wells, respectively, in autumn 1839; two penny press novelisations of Jack Sheppard published in 1839 and 1840; and an anonymous melodrama staged at the City of London Theatre in 1845, which was shut down due to violating the licensing ban on Jack Sheppard titles. From contemporary accounts of the mania, I argue that audience members treated historical and fictional accounts of Jack as describing the same entity, which created the space for specifying new facts and thus claiming new meaning. I therefore see Jack Sheppard as a transmedia character. For the labouring classes, claiming new meaning sometimes inhered in Jack’s defiance of capital punishment. This transmedial extension of Ainsworth’s character by working-class audiences in the penny press and cheap theatre pointed to the inadequacies of Victorian copyright law to protect the creative property of originating authors across media, and thus disturbed Victorian middle and upper-class literary critics because they saw the lower class’s celebration of a criminal as threatening to undermine their social order. Using the concept of transmedia in this period allows us to see how enthusiastic audience members in the working classes created what I term character complexity as they built a palimpsest out of the panoply of cross-media character representations. This transmedia character complexity matters because it is an avenue for oppressed communities to reclaim their dignity through narrative meaning-making.","PeriodicalId":34865,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Popular Fictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Popular Fictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46911/oyym7051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The reception of William Harrison Ainsworth’s novel, Jack Sheppard (1839-1840), was contemporaneously deemed a mania and has been described by critics today as a moral panic over the influence of fiction. Several adaptations of Ainsworth’s novel across media ambiguously depict Jack’s hanging, and the adaptations that most clearly show his survival occur in those versions that are least legally defensible and most clearly targeted toward the labouring classes. In this essay, I analyse Buckstone and Greenwood’s melodramas at the Adelphi and Sadler’s Wells, respectively, in autumn 1839; two penny press novelisations of Jack Sheppard published in 1839 and 1840; and an anonymous melodrama staged at the City of London Theatre in 1845, which was shut down due to violating the licensing ban on Jack Sheppard titles. From contemporary accounts of the mania, I argue that audience members treated historical and fictional accounts of Jack as describing the same entity, which created the space for specifying new facts and thus claiming new meaning. I therefore see Jack Sheppard as a transmedia character. For the labouring classes, claiming new meaning sometimes inhered in Jack’s defiance of capital punishment. This transmedial extension of Ainsworth’s character by working-class audiences in the penny press and cheap theatre pointed to the inadequacies of Victorian copyright law to protect the creative property of originating authors across media, and thus disturbed Victorian middle and upper-class literary critics because they saw the lower class’s celebration of a criminal as threatening to undermine their social order. Using the concept of transmedia in this period allows us to see how enthusiastic audience members in the working classes created what I term character complexity as they built a palimpsest out of the panoply of cross-media character representations. This transmedia character complexity matters because it is an avenue for oppressed communities to reclaim their dignity through narrative meaning-making.
威廉·哈里森·安斯沃思(William Harrison Ainsworth)的小说《杰克·谢泼德》(Jack Sheppard,1839-1840)在当时被认为是一种狂热,今天的评论家将其描述为对小说影响的道德恐慌。媒体对安斯沃思小说的几部改编作品都模糊地描述了杰克被绞死的情况,而最清楚地表明他幸存的改编作品出现在那些法律上最不可辩护、最明显针对工人阶级的版本中。在这篇文章中,我分析了巴克斯通和格林伍德分别于1839年秋在阿德尔菲和萨德勒威尔斯上演的情节剧;1839年和1840年出版的杰克·谢泼德的两部小说;以及1845年在伦敦市剧院上演的一部匿名情节剧,该剧因违反杰克·谢泼德电影的许可禁令而停播。从当代对狂热的描述来看,我认为观众将杰克的历史和虚构描述视为对同一实体的描述,这为指定新的事实创造了空间,从而声称了新的意义。因此,我认为杰克·谢泼德是一个跨媒体角色。对于工人阶级来说,声称新的意义有时源于杰克对死刑的蔑视。在廉价媒体和廉价剧院中,工人阶级观众对安斯沃思的角色进行了跨国界的延伸,这表明维多利亚州版权法在保护媒体原创作者的创作财产方面存在不足,因此,维多利亚时代的中上层文学评论家感到不安,因为他们认为下层阶级对罪犯的庆祝有可能破坏他们的社会秩序。在这一时期使用跨媒体的概念,可以让我们看到工人阶级中热情的观众是如何创造出我所说的角色复杂性的,因为他们从一系列跨媒体的角色表征中构建了一个重写本。这种跨媒体角色的复杂性很重要,因为它是受压迫社区通过叙事意义创造来重获尊严的途径。