Input force and floor impedance measurement for the standard tapping machine and the standard impact ball

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ACOUSTICS
Sunit Girdhar, A. Barnard, J. Blough, John Loverde, Wayland Dong
{"title":"Input force and floor impedance measurement for the standard tapping machine and the standard impact ball","authors":"Sunit Girdhar, A. Barnard, J. Blough, John Loverde, Wayland Dong","doi":"10.3397/1/37716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current ASTM and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard im- pact test method for floor-ceiling assemblies does not require the test engineer to measure the input force during the impact. A standard tapping machine or a standard impact ball is used for these tests, but\n these input sources usually do not have any provision to measure the input force. In this work, the input force of these impact methods was measured on seven different assemblies, and a modal hammer was used as a “control” source. The input force and average floor impedance were\n measured and compared to each other. The peak input force levels due to the tapping machine vary by approximately 38 dB from one floor to the other, and the frequency excitation bandwidth varies widely based on the type of floor construction. This shows that there is a need to measure the\n input force and scale the output sound quantity with the input force to get a frequency response function (FRF)-like quantity to compare different floor-ceiling assemblies. For the impact ball, the variation in low-frequency input force levels is almost non-existent, but the impact ball has\n a poor measurement signal-to-noise ratio above 80 Hz one-third octave band. The impedance measured using the impact ball matches closely with the control impedance measured using the modal hammer.","PeriodicalId":49748,"journal":{"name":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/37716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current ASTM and International Standards Organization (ISO) standard im- pact test method for floor-ceiling assemblies does not require the test engineer to measure the input force during the impact. A standard tapping machine or a standard impact ball is used for these tests, but these input sources usually do not have any provision to measure the input force. In this work, the input force of these impact methods was measured on seven different assemblies, and a modal hammer was used as a “control” source. The input force and average floor impedance were measured and compared to each other. The peak input force levels due to the tapping machine vary by approximately 38 dB from one floor to the other, and the frequency excitation bandwidth varies widely based on the type of floor construction. This shows that there is a need to measure the input force and scale the output sound quantity with the input force to get a frequency response function (FRF)-like quantity to compare different floor-ceiling assemblies. For the impact ball, the variation in low-frequency input force levels is almost non-existent, but the impact ball has a poor measurement signal-to-noise ratio above 80 Hz one-third octave band. The impedance measured using the impact ball matches closely with the control impedance measured using the modal hammer.
标准攻丝机和标准冲击球的输入力和地板阻抗测量
目前ASTM和国际标准组织(ISO)标准的地板-天花板组件冲击测试方法不要求测试工程师测量冲击过程中的输入力。标准攻丝机或标准冲击球用于这些测试,但这些输入源通常没有任何规定来测量输入力。在这项工作中,测量了这些冲击方法在七个不同组件上的输入力,并使用模态锤作为“控制”源。测量了输入力和平均底阻抗,并进行了比较。从一层楼到另一层楼,攻丝机产生的峰值输入力水平变化约为38 dB,频率激励带宽根据楼层结构的类型变化很大。这表明有必要测量输入力,并根据输入力对输出声量进行缩放,以获得类似频响函数(FRF)的量,以比较不同的地板-天花板组件。对于冲击球,低频输入力水平的变化几乎不存在,但冲击球在80 Hz三分之一倍频带以上的测量信噪比较差。使用冲击球测量的阻抗与使用模态锤测量的控制阻抗非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Noise Control Engineering Journal
Noise Control Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCEJ is the pre-eminent academic journal of noise control. It is the International Journal of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA. It is also produced with the participation and assistance of the Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineering (KSNVE). NCEJ reaches noise control professionals around the world, covering over 50 national noise control societies and institutes. INCE encourages you to submit your next paper to NCEJ. Choosing NCEJ: Provides the opportunity to reach a global audience of NCE professionals, academics, and students; Enhances the prestige of your work; Validates your work by formal peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信