{"title":"Which class will I be assigned to next year?","authors":"Joseph Klein, Hadas Landa","doi":"10.1080/10476210.2020.1758054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mathematics teacher training is intended to inculcate teaching skills for success in all learning levels. The aim of this study is to examine the questions: Which factors contribute to the successful assignment of teachers to learning levels? Can teachers teach all levels or only some? The findings should help to clarify which factors to consider for the proper assignment of teachers. Three hundred and twelve academic mathematics teachers were asked about their suitability to teach low and high levels of mathematics, feelings of teaching efficacy, attitudes toward high- and low-achieving students and efficacy and preferences in teaching underachievers. Extensive information was collected about their mathematics education. As most high school students are tested at the low level, most mathematics teachers are assigned to this level. Many more mathematics teachers feel suited to teach the high level rather than the low level. Factors explaining the success of teachers in the various levels were assessed. Academic educational level was not among the factors. The hypothesis is examined that new ways of thinking are required for developing teacher efficacy for lower mathematics levels. It is doubtful whether solely expanding teachers’ academic education will attain this objective. Principals are offered educational considerations for the optimal assignment of teachers.","PeriodicalId":46594,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"353 - 370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10476210.2020.1758054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1758054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Mathematics teacher training is intended to inculcate teaching skills for success in all learning levels. The aim of this study is to examine the questions: Which factors contribute to the successful assignment of teachers to learning levels? Can teachers teach all levels or only some? The findings should help to clarify which factors to consider for the proper assignment of teachers. Three hundred and twelve academic mathematics teachers were asked about their suitability to teach low and high levels of mathematics, feelings of teaching efficacy, attitudes toward high- and low-achieving students and efficacy and preferences in teaching underachievers. Extensive information was collected about their mathematics education. As most high school students are tested at the low level, most mathematics teachers are assigned to this level. Many more mathematics teachers feel suited to teach the high level rather than the low level. Factors explaining the success of teachers in the various levels were assessed. Academic educational level was not among the factors. The hypothesis is examined that new ways of thinking are required for developing teacher efficacy for lower mathematics levels. It is doubtful whether solely expanding teachers’ academic education will attain this objective. Principals are offered educational considerations for the optimal assignment of teachers.
期刊介绍:
Teaching Education is an interdisciplinary forum for innovative practices and research in teacher education. Submission of manuscripts from educational researchers, teacher educators and practicing teachers is encouraged. Contributions are invited which address social and cultural, practical and theoretical aspects of teacher education in university-, college-, and school-based contexts. The journal’s focus is on the challenges and possibilities of rapid social and cultural change for teacher education and, more broadly, for the transformation of education. These challenges include: the impact of new cultures and globalisation on curriculum and pedagogy; new collaborations and partnerships between universities, schools and other social service agencies; the consequences of new community and family configurations for teachers’ work; generational and cultural change in schools and teacher education institutions; new technologies and education; and the impact of higher education policy and funding on teacher education. Manuscripts addressing critical and theory-based research or scholarly reflections and debate on contemporary issues related to teacher education, will be considered. Papers should attempt to present research, innovative theoretical and/or practical insights in relevant current literature and debate.