“The Silent Partner”: Tonearms and Modular Masculinities in U.S. Midcentury Hi-Fi Culture

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Kelli Smith-Biwer
{"title":"“The Silent Partner”: Tonearms and Modular Masculinities in U.S. Midcentury Hi-Fi Culture","authors":"Kelli Smith-Biwer","doi":"10.1017/S1752196322000177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Advertisements for audio equipment in midcentury magazines, such as High Fidelity and HiFi Review, shaped the constructions that determined how masculinity was modeled, embodied, and fashioned in the United States at midcentury. A hi-fi setup was a material expression of self and masculinity that could be ever tweaked, refashioned, and adjusted. Tonearms, however, were (and still are) delicate, troublesome, and, when improperly calibrated, capable of destroying record grooves. Manufacturers, advertisers, and magazine contributors who strategically gendered other technologies as masculine—such as amplifiers and speakers—struggled to imbue tonearms with the same virility, toughness, and power. If the hi-fi system served as an embodied simulacrum of the masculine self, then the tonearm was a necessary and omni-present symbolic point of gendered questioning in masculine identity formation. In this article, I argue that the tonearm is a site of fluidity and ambiguity within a modular masculine system, and I demonstrate that the discourses around tonearms in 1950s hi-fi magazines provide an alternative window into discussions of gender and sexuality in United States print culture. Through image analysis and close reading of advertisements and equipment reviews, I decentralize hegemonic masculinity and make room for readings that draw upon feminist and queer theory. More broadly, I submit that mid-twentieth-century hi-fi discourses do not produce a single brand of anxiously conforming maleness, but rather an array of modular masculinities.","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":"16 1","pages":"319 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196322000177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Advertisements for audio equipment in midcentury magazines, such as High Fidelity and HiFi Review, shaped the constructions that determined how masculinity was modeled, embodied, and fashioned in the United States at midcentury. A hi-fi setup was a material expression of self and masculinity that could be ever tweaked, refashioned, and adjusted. Tonearms, however, were (and still are) delicate, troublesome, and, when improperly calibrated, capable of destroying record grooves. Manufacturers, advertisers, and magazine contributors who strategically gendered other technologies as masculine—such as amplifiers and speakers—struggled to imbue tonearms with the same virility, toughness, and power. If the hi-fi system served as an embodied simulacrum of the masculine self, then the tonearm was a necessary and omni-present symbolic point of gendered questioning in masculine identity formation. In this article, I argue that the tonearm is a site of fluidity and ambiguity within a modular masculine system, and I demonstrate that the discourses around tonearms in 1950s hi-fi magazines provide an alternative window into discussions of gender and sexuality in United States print culture. Through image analysis and close reading of advertisements and equipment reviews, I decentralize hegemonic masculinity and make room for readings that draw upon feminist and queer theory. More broadly, I submit that mid-twentieth-century hi-fi discourses do not produce a single brand of anxiously conforming maleness, but rather an array of modular masculinities.
“沉默的伴侣”:美国中世纪高保真文化中的音调武器和模块化男性气质
摘要本世纪中期杂志上的音频设备广告,如《高保真》和《高保真评论》,塑造了决定本世纪中期美国如何塑造、体现和塑造男子气概的结构。高保真设置是一种自我和男子气概的物质表达,可以进行调整、重塑和调整。然而,音臂过去(现在仍然)是精致、麻烦的,并且当校准不当时,能够破坏唱片凹槽。制造商、广告商和杂志撰稿人战略性地将其他技术(如放大器和扬声器)性别化为男性,他们很难给音调武器注入同样的男性气概、韧性和力量。如果高保真系统是男性自我的具体模拟物,那么音调臂是男性身份形成中性别质疑的必要且无所不在的象征点。在这篇文章中,我认为音调臂是模块化男性系统中流动性和模糊性的场所,我证明了20世纪50年代高保真杂志中围绕音调臂的论述为美国印刷文化中讨论性别和性提供了另一个窗口。通过图像分析和细读广告和设备评论,我分散了霸权的男子气概,并为借鉴女权主义和酷儿理论的阅读腾出了空间。更广泛地说,我认为,20世纪中期的高保真音乐话语并没有产生一种令人焦虑的顺从男性气质,而是产生了一系列模块化的男性气质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信