Comparison of a novel adhesive system and plate and screw for facial fracture osteosynthesis

R. Sharifi, M. Atai, M. Mohajeri, N. Bahrami
{"title":"Comparison of a novel adhesive system and plate and screw for facial fracture osteosynthesis","authors":"R. Sharifi, M. Atai, M. Mohajeri, N. Bahrami","doi":"10.18502/JCR.V6I1.1626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: in oral and maxillofacial fractures, plates and screws routinely fix fragments until the completion of healing process, which has its own complications in some critical fractures. To overcome this drawbacks bone adhesives are developed for the immobilization of fractured bones. \nObjective: In this in-vitro study we compared the bond strength obtained by immobilization of the bone fragments using plates and screw and new adhesive containing BTDMA monomer. \nMaterials and methods: In this experimental in-vitro trial, bone fractures were simulated in bovine’s mandibular bone using an electrical saw. The bone fragments were randomly allocated in different groups and were immobilized with either plate and screws and adhesive containing 0,10, 15% BTDMA. After 24 hours tensile bond strength was calculated using universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoe test were used for statistical analysis. \nResults: Mean (± standard deviation) of tensile bond strength of bone fixation using adhesive containing 15% (W/W) BTDMA monomer were 176.0 (±18.89) N. These values were 149.1 (±23.88) N for adhesive containing 10% BTDMA; 102(±17.99) N for the base adhesive and 278.9 (±24.12) N for the screw and plate technique. \nSignificant differences were found regarding bond strength of bone fixation in 4 groups using bone adhesives or plate technique (P<0.001). The highest bond strength was recorded for the plate group and the least was related to the base adhesive. Significant differences existed between all bone adhesives as declared by paired comparison (p<0.05). \nConclusion: Despite the lower bond strength in adhesive groups in comparison with screw and plate, with regards to possible complications of screw and plate technique, it seems bone adhesives containing BTDMA monomer can be used for bone fragment fixation. However, bond strength is just one of the numerous properties that an adhesive should have and more studies must be done on these kinds of adhesives.","PeriodicalId":52622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/JCR.V6I1.1626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: in oral and maxillofacial fractures, plates and screws routinely fix fragments until the completion of healing process, which has its own complications in some critical fractures. To overcome this drawbacks bone adhesives are developed for the immobilization of fractured bones. Objective: In this in-vitro study we compared the bond strength obtained by immobilization of the bone fragments using plates and screw and new adhesive containing BTDMA monomer. Materials and methods: In this experimental in-vitro trial, bone fractures were simulated in bovine’s mandibular bone using an electrical saw. The bone fragments were randomly allocated in different groups and were immobilized with either plate and screws and adhesive containing 0,10, 15% BTDMA. After 24 hours tensile bond strength was calculated using universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoe test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean (± standard deviation) of tensile bond strength of bone fixation using adhesive containing 15% (W/W) BTDMA monomer were 176.0 (±18.89) N. These values were 149.1 (±23.88) N for adhesive containing 10% BTDMA; 102(±17.99) N for the base adhesive and 278.9 (±24.12) N for the screw and plate technique. Significant differences were found regarding bond strength of bone fixation in 4 groups using bone adhesives or plate technique (P<0.001). The highest bond strength was recorded for the plate group and the least was related to the base adhesive. Significant differences existed between all bone adhesives as declared by paired comparison (p<0.05). Conclusion: Despite the lower bond strength in adhesive groups in comparison with screw and plate, with regards to possible complications of screw and plate technique, it seems bone adhesives containing BTDMA monomer can be used for bone fragment fixation. However, bond strength is just one of the numerous properties that an adhesive should have and more studies must be done on these kinds of adhesives.
新型粘接系统与钢板螺钉在面部骨折接骨中的应用比较
背景:在口腔颌面部骨折中,钢板和螺钉常规固定碎片直至愈合完成,但在一些危重骨折中有其自身的并发症。为了克服这一缺点,骨胶粘剂被开发用于骨折的固定。目的:比较钢板螺钉固定骨碎片与含BTDMA单体的新型粘接剂固定骨碎片的结合强度。材料和方法:在体外实验中,用电锯模拟牛下颌骨骨折。骨碎片随机分为不同组,分别用含0、10、15% BTDMA的钢板、螺钉和粘接剂固定。24h后用万能试验机计算拉伸粘结强度。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行统计分析。结果:含15% (W/W) BTDMA单体的粘接剂固定骨的拉伸强度平均值(±标准差)为176.0(±18.89)N,含10% BTDMA单体的粘接剂固定骨的拉伸强度平均值为149.1(±23.88)N;102(±17.99)N为基础粘合剂,278.9(±24.12)N为螺钉和钢板技术。4组使用骨粘接剂或钢板固定骨的结合强度差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。板组粘结强度最高,基材粘结强度最低。经配对比较,各骨粘接剂间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:虽然粘接剂组与螺钉和钢板的结合强度较低,但考虑到螺钉和钢板技术可能出现的并发症,含BTDMA单体的骨粘接剂似乎可以用于骨碎片固定。然而,粘合强度只是粘合剂应有的众多性能之一,必须对这些类型的粘合剂进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信