Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-14 DOI:10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010
Angelina Di Re, Salam Tooza, Jason Diab, Charbel Karam, Mina Sarofim, Kevin Ooi, Catherine Turner, Daniel Kozman, David Blomberg, Matthew Morgan
{"title":"Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life.","authors":"Angelina Di Re,&nbsp;Salam Tooza,&nbsp;Jason Diab,&nbsp;Charbel Karam,&nbsp;Mina Sarofim,&nbsp;Kevin Ooi,&nbsp;Catherine Turner,&nbsp;Daniel Kozman,&nbsp;David Blomberg,&nbsp;Matthew Morgan","doi":"10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients' quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients' quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey.

Results: One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180).

Conclusion: The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.

Abstract Image

直肠切除术吻合口漏后的结果,包括肠功能和生活质量。
目的吻合口漏是直肠切除术后一种罕见但具有潜在破坏性的并发症。我们的目的是提供一个最新的评估肠功能和生活质量的AL后,以及相关的短期和长期结果。方法回顾性分析某结直肠科及相关私立医院近10年来所有直肠切除术病例。收集相关的人口学、手术和组织病理学数据。对患者的生活质量和大便失禁进行前瞻性调查。这些患者与完成相同调查的非神经性痴呆患者相匹配。结果1394例患者中有100例入选。有AL者占66.0%,无AL者占10.0%,仅吻合口狭窄者占24.0%。采用抗生素治疗的占39.0%,经皮引流占9.0%,手术腹腔引流占19.0%,经直肠引流占6.0%,经皮和经直肠联合引流占2.0%,腹/经直肠联合引流占1.0%。1年成形率为15.0%。总体而言,AL患者的平均大便失禁严重程度评分高于对照组(8.06±10.5比2.92±4.92,P = 0.002)。AL患者的EuroQol视觉模拟评分(EQ-VAS)平均为76.23±19.85;这低于非al患者的匹配平均EQ-VAS(81.64±18.07),但无统计学意义(P = 0.180)。结论本研究中大多数AL患者仅使用抗生素治疗。长期来看,AL与较高的大便失禁评分相关;然而,这并不等于生活质量得分较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信