The differing approaches to sustainability between practising and academic Quantity Surveyors

Q3 Engineering
R. Seidu, B. Young, Connor Stanton, Job Momoh, K. Ayinla
{"title":"The differing approaches to sustainability between practising and academic Quantity Surveyors","authors":"R. Seidu, B. Young, Connor Stanton, Job Momoh, K. Ayinla","doi":"10.14424/ijcscm120122-1-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most interpretations of sustainability in construction stem from the definition of sustainable development, which is a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the future generation’s needs. Various research and sustainability studies within the construction industry focus on finding economical, social, and environmental balance. Construction professionals, such as Quantity Surveyors, begin their learning journey by studying in colleges and progressing to higher education. As the construction industry evolves through modern techniques, higher education institutions must also follow suit. These modern techniques have arisen due to the shift of ethos towards sustainability. Without the higher education institutions including this new knowledge in their curriculum, future professionals will not be equipped with the correct skills. Few research have been conducted in relation to students’ views on sustainability. Although such research is at a minute level, thus the converse side of the argument is how professional Quantity Surveyors view these topics on sustainability and whether they implement them in their daily duties. Hence, the research explores the differences in understanding between practicing and academic Quantity Surveyors on sustainable development in their various professional duties. The research was conducted using questionnaires that was distributed using survey monkey. The results were analysed through Spearman and ANOVA statistical tests to check their correlations. The study found a difference in the knowledge acquired by practicing and academic Quantity Surveyors. This finding conveys the importance of sustainability knowledge and how it is fundamental in achieving the UN sustainable goals and using such knowledge in practice.","PeriodicalId":37872,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14424/ijcscm120122-1-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most interpretations of sustainability in construction stem from the definition of sustainable development, which is a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the future generation’s needs. Various research and sustainability studies within the construction industry focus on finding economical, social, and environmental balance. Construction professionals, such as Quantity Surveyors, begin their learning journey by studying in colleges and progressing to higher education. As the construction industry evolves through modern techniques, higher education institutions must also follow suit. These modern techniques have arisen due to the shift of ethos towards sustainability. Without the higher education institutions including this new knowledge in their curriculum, future professionals will not be equipped with the correct skills. Few research have been conducted in relation to students’ views on sustainability. Although such research is at a minute level, thus the converse side of the argument is how professional Quantity Surveyors view these topics on sustainability and whether they implement them in their daily duties. Hence, the research explores the differences in understanding between practicing and academic Quantity Surveyors on sustainable development in their various professional duties. The research was conducted using questionnaires that was distributed using survey monkey. The results were analysed through Spearman and ANOVA statistical tests to check their correlations. The study found a difference in the knowledge acquired by practicing and academic Quantity Surveyors. This finding conveys the importance of sustainability knowledge and how it is fundamental in achieving the UN sustainable goals and using such knowledge in practice.
实践工料测量师与学术工料测量师在可持续发展方面的不同方法
对建筑业可持续性的大多数解释源于可持续发展的定义,可持续发展是一种在不影响下一代需求的情况下满足当前需求的发展。建筑行业内的各种研究和可持续性研究侧重于寻找经济、社会和环境平衡。建筑专业人士,如工料测量师,通过在大学学习和接受高等教育来开始他们的学习之旅。随着建筑业通过现代技术的发展,高等教育机构也必须效仿。这些现代技术是由于社会风气向可持续性转变而产生的。如果没有高等教育机构将这些新知识纳入课程,未来的专业人员将无法掌握正确的技能。很少有研究涉及学生对可持续性的看法。尽管这类研究只是一个微小的层面,但争论的另一面是专业工料测量师如何看待这些可持续性主题,以及他们是否在日常工作中实施这些主题。因此,本研究探讨了执业和学术工料测量师在履行各种职业职责时对可持续发展的理解差异。这项研究是使用调查猴子分发的问卷进行的。通过Spearman和ANOVA统计检验对结果进行分析,以检验其相关性。研究发现,执业工料测量师和学术工料测量员所获得的知识存在差异。这一发现传达了可持续性知识的重要性,以及可持续性知识在实现联合国可持续发展目标和在实践中使用这些知识方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信