Minjian: the Rise of China’s Grassroots Intellectuals

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
G. Yi
{"title":"Minjian: the Rise of China’s Grassroots Intellectuals","authors":"G. Yi","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1788871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"politics and radical welfare reforms were highly unusual, the problems that challenged Chinese welfare reformers were not. The difficulties posed by the high cost of expanding social insurance coverage is a poor economy were faced by almost all developing countries in the postwar period. Scarcity provides a simpler explanation of the changing dynamics of Chinese welfare politics in the 1950s than either level or the nature of income inequality. It might also serve to reconcile the contradictory findings about class segmentation and welfare coalitions in Western Europe and Latin America. With the national social assistance program and broad welfare coverage in health care and pension programs, the new Chinese welfare state can be expected to reduce poverty, especially in the countryside. But unless there are major policy changes, the Chinese welfare state will not be as progressive as the European welfare states or even the American welfare state. Nara Dillon used new materials to build up a solid analytical foundation for his case study of the radical inequalities: China’s Revolutionary Welfare State in Comparative Perspective. He correctly pointed out that many factors caused the inequalities after the Communist took control over mainland China under a universal coverage welfare goals and policies, but the most obvious and important was the poor economic conditions. He chose the gap between urban residents between the state owned employees and the collective entity employees over their workplace welfare; the narrow coverage among the urban residents and the residents in rural areas. He compared these inequalities in China with those in other developing countries and showed that they all reflected certain level of similarity in nature. Nara Dillon reached his conclusion that the institutional build up of the welfare state in China cannot be comparable to that of the Europe and the United States under current design and model. He noticed the great efforts in China to improve the welfare state would surely reduce poverty level in both the urban area and countryside, but he did not mention how China could catch up with the European or the American standard. The major policy changes he touched that would be progressive as compared to Europe and the United States lacked the persuasive evidences, especially when the global crisis such as Covid-19 breakout occurred.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"80 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1788871","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1788871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

politics and radical welfare reforms were highly unusual, the problems that challenged Chinese welfare reformers were not. The difficulties posed by the high cost of expanding social insurance coverage is a poor economy were faced by almost all developing countries in the postwar period. Scarcity provides a simpler explanation of the changing dynamics of Chinese welfare politics in the 1950s than either level or the nature of income inequality. It might also serve to reconcile the contradictory findings about class segmentation and welfare coalitions in Western Europe and Latin America. With the national social assistance program and broad welfare coverage in health care and pension programs, the new Chinese welfare state can be expected to reduce poverty, especially in the countryside. But unless there are major policy changes, the Chinese welfare state will not be as progressive as the European welfare states or even the American welfare state. Nara Dillon used new materials to build up a solid analytical foundation for his case study of the radical inequalities: China’s Revolutionary Welfare State in Comparative Perspective. He correctly pointed out that many factors caused the inequalities after the Communist took control over mainland China under a universal coverage welfare goals and policies, but the most obvious and important was the poor economic conditions. He chose the gap between urban residents between the state owned employees and the collective entity employees over their workplace welfare; the narrow coverage among the urban residents and the residents in rural areas. He compared these inequalities in China with those in other developing countries and showed that they all reflected certain level of similarity in nature. Nara Dillon reached his conclusion that the institutional build up of the welfare state in China cannot be comparable to that of the Europe and the United States under current design and model. He noticed the great efforts in China to improve the welfare state would surely reduce poverty level in both the urban area and countryside, but he did not mention how China could catch up with the European or the American standard. The major policy changes he touched that would be progressive as compared to Europe and the United States lacked the persuasive evidences, especially when the global crisis such as Covid-19 breakout occurred.
民建:中国基层知识分子的崛起
政治和激进的福利改革是极不寻常的,但挑战中国福利改革者的问题却并非如此。由于经济不景气,扩大社会保险覆盖面的高成本所带来的困难几乎是战后所有发展中国家都面临的。与收入不平等的水平或性质相比,稀缺性可以更简单地解释上世纪50年代中国福利政治的动态变化。它还可能有助于调和西欧和拉丁美洲关于阶级分割和福利联盟的相互矛盾的发现。随着国家社会救助计划和广泛的医疗保健和养老金福利覆盖,新的中国福利国家有望减少贫困,特别是在农村。但除非有重大的政策变化,否则中国的福利国家不会像欧洲的福利国家甚至美国的福利国家那样进步。Nara Dillon用新的材料为他的激进不平等案例研究——比较视角下的中国革命福利国家——建立了坚实的分析基础。他正确地指出,共产党在全民覆盖的福利目标和政策下控制中国大陆后,造成不平等的因素有很多,但最明显和最重要的是经济状况不佳。他选择了城市居民、国有职工和集体单位职工之间的差距,而不是他们的工作场所福利;城镇居民和农村居民覆盖面窄。他将中国的这些不平等现象与其他发展中国家的不平等现象进行了比较,表明它们在本质上都反映出一定程度的相似性。狄龙的结论是,在目前的设计和模式下,中国福利国家的制度建设无法与欧美相提并论。他注意到中国在改善福利国家方面做出的巨大努力肯定会减少城市和农村的贫困水平,但他没有提到中国如何赶上欧美标准。他所提到的与欧洲和美国相比具有进步意义的重大政策变化,特别是在发生新冠疫情等全球性危机的情况下,缺乏令人信服的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Chinese Historical Review is a fully refereed and vigorously edited journal of history and social sciences that is published biannually. The journal publishes original research on the history of China in every period, China''s historical relations with the world, the historical experiences of the overseas Chinese, as well as comparative and transnational studies of history and social sciences. Its Forum section features interviews with leading scholars on issues concerning history and the historical profession. Its Book Reviews section introduces recent historical scholarship published in English, Chinese, and other languages. The journal is published on behalf of The Chinese Historians in the United States, Inc. (CHUS), which was established in 1987 and is an affiliated society of The American Historical Association (AHA) and The Association for Asian Studies (AAS). The journal began its publication in 1987 under the title Historian. In 1989 it was registered with the Library of Congress and began its publication as a refereed journal of history under the title Chinese Historians. It adopted the current title in 2004.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书