“In there but not in there”: sibling sexual abuse as a disruptor in the field of child sexual abuse

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P. Yates, S. Allardyce
{"title":"“In there but not in there”: sibling sexual abuse as a disruptor in the field of child sexual abuse","authors":"P. Yates, S. Allardyce","doi":"10.1080/13552600.2023.2225547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this commentary paper, which draws on the authors’ own past research and practice experience in the field of child sexual abuse prevention as well as a thorough knowledge of the extant literature, we argue that sibling sexual abuse challenges conventional thinking about child sexual abuse, both in terms of how the general public conceptualises child sexual abuse and in terms of our practice responses to it. Traditional service responses are often inadequate and inappropriate in situations involving sexual abuse between siblings. The question is further raised as to whether traditional service responses are appropriate for other forms of child sexual abuse. We argue that instead of siloed, individualist therapy and criminal or youth justice responses, whole-family responses are required, which draw on the principles of family therapy and restorative justice.","PeriodicalId":46758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2023.2225547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this commentary paper, which draws on the authors’ own past research and practice experience in the field of child sexual abuse prevention as well as a thorough knowledge of the extant literature, we argue that sibling sexual abuse challenges conventional thinking about child sexual abuse, both in terms of how the general public conceptualises child sexual abuse and in terms of our practice responses to it. Traditional service responses are often inadequate and inappropriate in situations involving sexual abuse between siblings. The question is further raised as to whether traditional service responses are appropriate for other forms of child sexual abuse. We argue that instead of siloed, individualist therapy and criminal or youth justice responses, whole-family responses are required, which draw on the principles of family therapy and restorative justice.
“在那里,但不在那里”:兄弟姐妹性虐待作为儿童性虐待领域的破坏者
在这篇评论文章中,作者借鉴了自己过去在儿童性虐待预防领域的研究和实践经验,以及对现有文献的全面了解,我们认为兄弟姐妹性虐待挑战了关于儿童性虐待的传统思维,无论是在公众如何概念化儿童性虐待方面,还是在我们对儿童性虐待的实践反应方面。在涉及兄弟姐妹之间性虐待的情况下,传统的服务反应往往是不充分和不适当的。有人进一步提出的问题是,传统的服务答复是否适用于其他形式的儿童性虐待。我们认为,需要的不是孤立的个人主义治疗和犯罪或青年司法反应,而是利用家庭治疗和恢复性司法原则的全家庭反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Journal of Sexual Aggression CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信