Nonprofit organizational legitimacy and government grants under authoritarianism: evidence from Chinese foundations

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Qun Wang
{"title":"Nonprofit organizational legitimacy and government grants under authoritarianism: evidence from Chinese foundations","authors":"Qun Wang","doi":"10.1080/10967494.2022.2077866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The literature on NGOs under authoritarian rule largely attributes NGOs’ receipt of government grants to their political connections. This article presents an alternative explanation by asking the question: Does nonprofit organizational legitimacy influence the receipt of government grants under authoritarianism? Applying logit regression to 2,021 Chinese foundations, this article proposes that passing the nonprofit evaluation, which is one of the major certification programs in the country’s nonprofit sector, is positively related to the probability of receiving government grants. Subsample analysis reveals that nonprofit evaluation is influential for the receipt of government grants primarily among foundations formally affiliated with government agencies. This article provides for the first time evidence that contemporary authoritarian regimes appreciate nonprofit organizational legitimacy, albeit still in a highly politicized manner.","PeriodicalId":47671,"journal":{"name":"International Public Management Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"489 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2077866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The literature on NGOs under authoritarian rule largely attributes NGOs’ receipt of government grants to their political connections. This article presents an alternative explanation by asking the question: Does nonprofit organizational legitimacy influence the receipt of government grants under authoritarianism? Applying logit regression to 2,021 Chinese foundations, this article proposes that passing the nonprofit evaluation, which is one of the major certification programs in the country’s nonprofit sector, is positively related to the probability of receiving government grants. Subsample analysis reveals that nonprofit evaluation is influential for the receipt of government grants primarily among foundations formally affiliated with government agencies. This article provides for the first time evidence that contemporary authoritarian regimes appreciate nonprofit organizational legitimacy, albeit still in a highly politicized manner.
威权主义下的非营利组织合法性与政府拨款——来自中国基金会的证据
摘要关于独裁统治下的非政府组织的文献在很大程度上将非政府组织获得政府拨款归因于其政治关系。本文提出了另一种解释,提出了一个问题:非营利组织的合法性是否会影响威权主义下政府拨款的接收?本文将logit回归应用于2021年中国基金会,提出通过非营利评估与获得政府资助的概率呈正相关。非营利评估是中国非营利部门的主要认证项目之一。子样本分析表明,非营利组织的评估对政府拨款的接收有影响,主要是在正式隶属于政府机构的基金会中。这篇文章首次提供了证据,证明当代威权政权欣赏非营利组织的合法性,尽管仍以高度政治化的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Public Management Journal (IPMJ) publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical work on managing large organizations, particularly public organizations. IPMJ features work from scholars around the world who conduct research in the areas of public management and government reform, comparative public administration, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. IPMJ seeks to provide a bridge between those conducting research on public management and public administration on the one hand, and those working in the areas of organizational behavior and organization theory on the other. IPMJ intends to stimulate and reflect the academic interests of an international constituency of readers and scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信