Extending Soundwalking Practice: Soundsitting as an Inclusive and Complementary Method to Soundwalking

IF 1.3 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Neil Bruce
{"title":"Extending Soundwalking Practice: Soundsitting as an Inclusive and Complementary Method to Soundwalking","authors":"Neil Bruce","doi":"10.3390/acoustics5030046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes the ‘soundsit’ as an alternative method to be used independently or in conjunction with current soundwalking methodological practice. The soundsit seeks to address the limits of the soundwalking method in relation to issues of transition, changing context, event occurrence, temporality, and inclusivity. Soundwalking and soundsitting are both methods of experiencing soundscape: soundwalking involves exploring and listening to the sounds of the environment while moving through it, while soundsitting involves sitting still in a particular place and listening to the sounds that exist in situ. The soundsit provides the participant or researcher with a fixed perspective and place to observe and experience sounds, within a defined soundscape context, enabling them to gain a longer-term experiential understanding of a space. Analogous with acoustic measurements, soundsitting is comparable to capturing average energy equivalent sound level LAeq measurements in allowing the perception of and activities within a soundscape to settle into a steady state. Beyond obtaining a longer-term impression of a chosen sound environment, soundsitting allows for a participant to disengage with the visual, which allows for deeper engagement and focus when listening to a soundscape; in addition, soundsitting removes the safety implications and distractions of walking practice and, as such, is a more inclusive form of activity, allowing those who are unable to walk to engage in the practice. The static nature of the listening experience allows for a different type of immersion through engaged active listening, something which is not possible on a soundwalk, allowing for deeper qualitative analysis and insight into the soundscape of a specific space or location. The primary findings show with test group of n = 6 that both methods are effective soundscape study tools, and further work with diverse groups is required.","PeriodicalId":72045,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics5030046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes the ‘soundsit’ as an alternative method to be used independently or in conjunction with current soundwalking methodological practice. The soundsit seeks to address the limits of the soundwalking method in relation to issues of transition, changing context, event occurrence, temporality, and inclusivity. Soundwalking and soundsitting are both methods of experiencing soundscape: soundwalking involves exploring and listening to the sounds of the environment while moving through it, while soundsitting involves sitting still in a particular place and listening to the sounds that exist in situ. The soundsit provides the participant or researcher with a fixed perspective and place to observe and experience sounds, within a defined soundscape context, enabling them to gain a longer-term experiential understanding of a space. Analogous with acoustic measurements, soundsitting is comparable to capturing average energy equivalent sound level LAeq measurements in allowing the perception of and activities within a soundscape to settle into a steady state. Beyond obtaining a longer-term impression of a chosen sound environment, soundsitting allows for a participant to disengage with the visual, which allows for deeper engagement and focus when listening to a soundscape; in addition, soundsitting removes the safety implications and distractions of walking practice and, as such, is a more inclusive form of activity, allowing those who are unable to walk to engage in the practice. The static nature of the listening experience allows for a different type of immersion through engaged active listening, something which is not possible on a soundwalk, allowing for deeper qualitative analysis and insight into the soundscape of a specific space or location. The primary findings show with test group of n = 6 that both methods are effective soundscape study tools, and further work with diverse groups is required.
拓展Soundwalk实践:Soundwalking是一种包容性和互补性的方法
本文提出“soundsit”作为一种替代方法,可以独立使用,也可以与当前的soundwalking方法实践结合使用。soundsit试图解决声音行走方法在过渡、变化的背景、事件发生、时间性和包容性等问题上的局限性。Soundwalking和Soundsiting都是体验声景的方法:Soundwalk涉及在环境中移动时探索和倾听环境的声音,而Soundsition涉及在特定的地方静止不动,倾听原地存在的声音。soundsit为参与者或研究人员提供了一个固定的视角和场所,在定义的声景背景下观察和体验声音,使他们能够获得对空间的长期体验理解。与声学测量类似,在允许对声景的感知和声景内的活动进入稳定状态方面,坐声与捕捉平均能量等效声级LAeq测量相当。除了获得对所选声音环境的长期印象外,坐声还允许参与者脱离视觉,这允许在听声景时更深入地参与和集中注意力;此外,坐声消除了步行练习的安全隐患和干扰,因此,坐声是一种更具包容性的活动形式,允许那些无法步行的人参与练习。聆听体验的静态性质允许通过积极参与的聆听来获得不同类型的沉浸感,这在声音漫步中是不可能的,允许对特定空间或地点的声景进行更深入的定性分析和洞察。初步研究结果表明,在n=6的测试组中,这两种方法都是有效的声景研究工具,需要与不同的小组进行进一步的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信