Self-removing antegrade tethered ureteric stents after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the COVID-19 era: A prospective study from a university teaching hospital

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
B. Reddy, M. Kulshreshtha, S. Reddy, S. Pillai, A. Chawla, M. Shah, B. Somani, Sanket Kankaria
{"title":"Self-removing antegrade tethered ureteric stents after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the COVID-19 era: A prospective study from a university teaching hospital","authors":"B. Reddy, M. Kulshreshtha, S. Reddy, S. Pillai, A. Chawla, M. Shah, B. Somani, Sanket Kankaria","doi":"10.4103/UROS.UROS_46_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of self-removing antegrade tethered stents after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Instead of routine placement of double-J stent which requires endoscopic removal, a tethered antegrade stent after tubeless PNL as an exit strategy followed by self-removal can obviate the need of early postoperative revisit. A prospective observational study in a university teaching hospital was conducted during the lockdown period from May 2021–June 2021 with the use of antegrade tethered stent in 30 patients and we studied the complications associated with it. Results: The average stone size among the patients was 2.4 cm (1.2–4.9). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) till the time of stent removal was 30.8 + 4.4 mm while the VAS at stent removal was 26.6 + 3.8 mm. None of the patients had urine leak or hemorrhage from the site of percutaneous access after self-removal of stent. Two (6.66 percent) patients had grade I and grade II modified Clavien–Dindo complication. The mean score of satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) Questionnaire was 31 (34–27). The present study demonstrates that tubeless PNL with antegrade tethered stent has the advantages of avoiding hospital visits for stent removal during COVID-19. Conclusion: The use of an antegrade threaded stent is safe, culminating in minimal morbidity and patient distress, and greater overall patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":23449,"journal":{"name":"Urological Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"70 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/UROS.UROS_46_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of self-removing antegrade tethered stents after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Instead of routine placement of double-J stent which requires endoscopic removal, a tethered antegrade stent after tubeless PNL as an exit strategy followed by self-removal can obviate the need of early postoperative revisit. A prospective observational study in a university teaching hospital was conducted during the lockdown period from May 2021–June 2021 with the use of antegrade tethered stent in 30 patients and we studied the complications associated with it. Results: The average stone size among the patients was 2.4 cm (1.2–4.9). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) till the time of stent removal was 30.8 + 4.4 mm while the VAS at stent removal was 26.6 + 3.8 mm. None of the patients had urine leak or hemorrhage from the site of percutaneous access after self-removal of stent. Two (6.66 percent) patients had grade I and grade II modified Clavien–Dindo complication. The mean score of satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) Questionnaire was 31 (34–27). The present study demonstrates that tubeless PNL with antegrade tethered stent has the advantages of avoiding hospital visits for stent removal during COVID-19. Conclusion: The use of an antegrade threaded stent is safe, culminating in minimal morbidity and patient distress, and greater overall patient satisfaction.
新型冠状病毒肺炎时代经皮无管肾镜取石术后自行移除顺行栓系输尿管支架的前瞻性研究
目的:评价新型冠状病毒病疫情期间经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)后自行移除顺行栓系支架的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:常规放置双j型支架需要内镜下取出,无管PNL后使用系留顺行支架作为退出策略,然后自行取出,可以避免术后早期重访。在2021年5月至2021年6月封锁期间,我们在某大学教学医院进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,对30例患者使用顺行栓系支架,并研究了与之相关的并发症。结果:患者结石平均大小为2.4 cm(1.2 ~ 4.9)。术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)至支架取出时为30.8 + 4.4 mm,支架取出时为26.6 + 3.8 mm。自行取出支架后,所有患者均未发生经皮通路尿漏或出血。2例(6.66%)患者有I级和II级改良Clavien-Dindo并发症。生活满意度问卷(SWLS)平均得分为31分(34-27分)。本研究表明,无管PNL采用顺行系留支架具有避免在COVID-19期间住院取支架的优点。结论:顺行螺纹支架的使用是安全的,发病率和患者痛苦最小,患者总体满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urological Science
Urological Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信