American neurology fellowship setup and its enlightenment to specialized training in China

Min Qian, L. Cui, Qin Lan
{"title":"American neurology fellowship setup and its enlightenment to specialized training in China","authors":"Min Qian, L. Cui, Qin Lan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the recent advancements in the standardized neurology residency training in China, standardized neurology fellowship training has become a crucial next step for China′s graduate medical education. The design of the fellowship and development of relevant norms and standards to ensure quality training constitute key areas in need of further consideration. The United States has established a standardized neurology fellowship training for nearly 30 years and has been successful in ensuring high quality physician training. Currently there are 9 accreditation council for graduate medical education (ACGME) accredited neurology fellowship programs in the USA, including clinical neurophysiology, pain medicine, neurodevelopmental disabilities, vascular neurology, neuromuscular medicine, sleep medicine, endovascular surgical neuroradiology, epilepsy and brain injury medicine. Among them, the number of fellowship training programs in vascular neurology, clinical neurophysiology, and epilepsy are relatively stable or show continuous growth, while neurodevelopmental disabilities and brain injury medicine remain stagnant or even retrogressive. It indicates that design of the neurology fellowship training calls for full weight of a wide array of factors, taking into account the number of subspecialty patients, clinical applications, prospects for future development of the subspecialties, and lessons learned from the United States. We can start with ACGME accredited steady growth fellowship programs and then add others in the future accordingly. \n \n \nKey words: \nNeurology; Sub-specialty; Fellowship; United States","PeriodicalId":56974,"journal":{"name":"中华医院管理杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"789-792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医院管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of the recent advancements in the standardized neurology residency training in China, standardized neurology fellowship training has become a crucial next step for China′s graduate medical education. The design of the fellowship and development of relevant norms and standards to ensure quality training constitute key areas in need of further consideration. The United States has established a standardized neurology fellowship training for nearly 30 years and has been successful in ensuring high quality physician training. Currently there are 9 accreditation council for graduate medical education (ACGME) accredited neurology fellowship programs in the USA, including clinical neurophysiology, pain medicine, neurodevelopmental disabilities, vascular neurology, neuromuscular medicine, sleep medicine, endovascular surgical neuroradiology, epilepsy and brain injury medicine. Among them, the number of fellowship training programs in vascular neurology, clinical neurophysiology, and epilepsy are relatively stable or show continuous growth, while neurodevelopmental disabilities and brain injury medicine remain stagnant or even retrogressive. It indicates that design of the neurology fellowship training calls for full weight of a wide array of factors, taking into account the number of subspecialty patients, clinical applications, prospects for future development of the subspecialties, and lessons learned from the United States. We can start with ACGME accredited steady growth fellowship programs and then add others in the future accordingly. Key words: Neurology; Sub-specialty; Fellowship; United States
美国神经病学奖学金制度及其对中国专科培训的启示
鉴于我国神经病学住院医师规范化培训的最新进展,规范化神经病学奖学金培训已成为我国医学研究生教育的下一步。研究金的设计和制定相关规范和标准以确保高质量的培训是需要进一步考虑的关键领域。美国建立了近30年的标准化神经病学研究金培训,并成功确保了高质量的医生培训。目前,美国有9个研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认证的神经病学研究金项目,包括临床神经生理学、疼痛医学、神经发育障碍、血管神经病学、神经肌肉医学、睡眠医学、血管内外科神经放射学、癫痫和脑损伤医学。其中,血管神经病学、临床神经生理学和癫痫的研究金培训项目数量相对稳定或持续增长,而神经发育障碍和脑损伤医学则停滞不前甚至倒退。这表明,神经病学研究金培训的设计需要充分考虑一系列因素,考虑到亚专业患者的数量、临床应用、亚专业未来发展的前景以及从美国吸取的教训。我们可以从ACGME认可的稳定增长奖学金项目开始,然后在未来相应地增加其他项目。关键词:神经病学;子专业;奖学金;美国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9658
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信