Book review

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Christopher P. Hood
{"title":"Book review","authors":"Christopher P. Hood","doi":"10.1080/09555803.2020.1776754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Too few academics study sports. As I know from my own experience of writing an undergraduate dissertation about the creation of the J.League and the plans to host the 2002 World Cup in Japan, many are happy to deride sports as not a serious subject, and that is part of the reason why I have yet to return to doing much work in this area. Yet, as Kelly (p.1) notes, ‘sports are far more than fun and games’. Kelly’s study, therefore, is a very welcome addition to the field. The first thing to consider in relation to the book, is who is it for? Is it for academics (and if so, which discipline)? Is it for sports fans? Is it specifically for Hanshin Tigers fans? Of course, these three readerships (and there may be others) are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, as an academic who likes a variety of sports and who has been supporting Hanshin Tigers for nearly 30 years, the book particularly appealed to me. I have been looking forward to its publication since I was aware of its development, having heard Kelly give a presentation at Oxford Brookes back in 2011. It’s been a long wait and the issue of timing is one of the issues that any reader needs to be aware of when reaching for this book. Even when Kelly gave that paper, some 8 years had passed since he had completed the last of eight main fieldwork trips to Japan, having started the work in 1996. Does this mean that the book is out of date, therefore? I would say most certainly not – so long as you approach it in the right frame of mind. After all, the reality is that many academic studies can become dated in some form soon after publication, regardless of when fieldwork has been done. But most will have lessons for readers, even if there have been some significant changes (as applies in this study, which Kelly addresses in the final chapter which based on additional research done in the years since 2003). During much of the time that Kelly conducted his fieldwork, and most of the years prior to that, Hanshin Tigers were not a successful team. In fact, they often finished bottom of the League. Kelly admits (p.21) that when he began his research he was ‘fixated on and somewhat blinded by this apparent thematic of failure’. But, Kelly, through his fieldwork, came to appreciate that Hanshin Tigers is more than a matter of performance in the Central League standings. Given how many times Kelly presses home the poor performance of the Tigers over the decades, I find it somewhat ironic that in years I have been supporting them, the Tigers have been the most successful of the three professional sports teams I support (Cincinnati Bengals have only been to one Super Bowl, which they lost, and","PeriodicalId":44495,"journal":{"name":"Japan Forum","volume":"33 1","pages":"445 - 447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09555803.2020.1776754","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2020.1776754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Too few academics study sports. As I know from my own experience of writing an undergraduate dissertation about the creation of the J.League and the plans to host the 2002 World Cup in Japan, many are happy to deride sports as not a serious subject, and that is part of the reason why I have yet to return to doing much work in this area. Yet, as Kelly (p.1) notes, ‘sports are far more than fun and games’. Kelly’s study, therefore, is a very welcome addition to the field. The first thing to consider in relation to the book, is who is it for? Is it for academics (and if so, which discipline)? Is it for sports fans? Is it specifically for Hanshin Tigers fans? Of course, these three readerships (and there may be others) are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, as an academic who likes a variety of sports and who has been supporting Hanshin Tigers for nearly 30 years, the book particularly appealed to me. I have been looking forward to its publication since I was aware of its development, having heard Kelly give a presentation at Oxford Brookes back in 2011. It’s been a long wait and the issue of timing is one of the issues that any reader needs to be aware of when reaching for this book. Even when Kelly gave that paper, some 8 years had passed since he had completed the last of eight main fieldwork trips to Japan, having started the work in 1996. Does this mean that the book is out of date, therefore? I would say most certainly not – so long as you approach it in the right frame of mind. After all, the reality is that many academic studies can become dated in some form soon after publication, regardless of when fieldwork has been done. But most will have lessons for readers, even if there have been some significant changes (as applies in this study, which Kelly addresses in the final chapter which based on additional research done in the years since 2003). During much of the time that Kelly conducted his fieldwork, and most of the years prior to that, Hanshin Tigers were not a successful team. In fact, they often finished bottom of the League. Kelly admits (p.21) that when he began his research he was ‘fixated on and somewhat blinded by this apparent thematic of failure’. But, Kelly, through his fieldwork, came to appreciate that Hanshin Tigers is more than a matter of performance in the Central League standings. Given how many times Kelly presses home the poor performance of the Tigers over the decades, I find it somewhat ironic that in years I have been supporting them, the Tigers have been the most successful of the three professional sports teams I support (Cincinnati Bengals have only been to one Super Bowl, which they lost, and
书评
研究体育的学者太少了。正如我自己写一篇关于J联赛创建和2002年日本世界杯主办计划的本科生论文的经历所知,许多人乐于嘲笑体育不是一个严肃的话题,这也是我尚未回到这一领域从事大量工作的部分原因。然而,正如Kelly(第1页)所指出的,“运动远不止是乐趣和游戏”。因此,凯利的研究是该领域一个非常受欢迎的补充。关于这本书,首先要考虑的是,它是为谁写的?是针对学术界的吗(如果是,是哪门学科)?是给体育迷的吗?是专门为阪神虎球迷准备的吗?当然,这三个读者群(可能还有其他读者群)并不相互排斥。事实上,作为一个喜欢各种运动的学者,以及近30年来一直支持阪神虎队的学者,这本书特别吸引我。自从我意识到它的发展以来,我一直期待着它的出版,2011年我听凯利在牛津布鲁克斯大学做了一次演讲。这是一个漫长的等待,时间问题是任何读者在阅读这本书时都需要注意的问题之一。即使在凯利发表这篇论文时,距离他于1996年开始这项工作,完成八次主要日本实地考察中的最后一次已经过去了大约8年。因此,这是否意味着这本书已经过时了?我想说,当然不会——只要你以正确的心态对待它。毕竟,现实是,无论何时进行实地调查,许多学术研究在发表后不久就会以某种形式过时。但大多数人都会给读者带来教训,即使发生了一些重大变化(正如本研究中所应用的那样,Kelly在最后一章中根据2003年以来的额外研究进行了阐述)。在凯利进行实地考察的大部分时间里,以及在此之前的大部分时间,阪神虎队都不是一支成功的球队。事实上,他们经常在联赛中垫底。凯利承认(第21页),当他开始研究时,他“专注于这个明显的失败主题,并在某种程度上被它蒙蔽了双眼”。但是,通过实地考察,凯利逐渐意识到,阪神虎队在中央联盟的排名不仅仅是一个表现问题。考虑到凯利多少次强调老虎队几十年来的糟糕表现,我觉得有点讽刺的是,在我支持他们的几年里,老虎队是我支持的三支职业运动队中最成功的(辛辛那提孟加拉人队只参加过一次超级碗,但他们输了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japan Forum
Japan Forum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信