Citation Analysis and Medical Reference: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15424065.2022.2150352

Dan Stuart, David Petersen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Three leading research databases—PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus—each offer unique ways of indexing citations and interpreting an article’s impact. Identifying the approach each takes to citation analysis and marking their distinctions has implications for not only scholars but information professionals engaged with medical reference.

查看原文本刊更多论文

引文分析和医学参考:PubMed, Web of Science和Scopus

三个领先的研究数据库——pubmed、Web of Science和scopus——每个都提供了索引引用和解释文章影响的独特方法。确定每种方法用于引文分析并标记其区别不仅对学者而且对从事医学参考的信息专业人员都有意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries is a peer-reviewed professional journal devoted to the access, evaluation, and management of electronic resources in the medical library environment. This journal will be an essential resource for academic medical school libraries, hospital libraries, and other health sciences libraries. The material in the Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries will complement articles published in Medical Reference Services Quarterly (also edited by M. Sandra Wood), which highlights the reference and bibliographic instruction aspects of electronic resources.