Farm Crime and Farmer-Police Relationships in Rural Australia

K. Mulrooney, Alistair Harkness, Huw Nolan
{"title":"Farm Crime and Farmer-Police Relationships in Rural Australia","authors":"K. Mulrooney, Alistair Harkness, Huw Nolan","doi":"10.18061/ijrc.v7i1.9106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents select findings from ‘farm crime’ victimisation surveys undertaken in the two most populous Australian states of New South Wales and Victoria. We examine the findings in relation to farmer crime victimisation, their willingness to report crime, and their worry about crime, as well as farmer perspectives on policing generally and the policing of farm crime specifically. In both states, there are high levels of victimisation, high levels of worry, low- to mid-levels of confidence in the police, and there remains a gap between experiences of farm crime and reporting. Both states have police tasked specifically with addressing farm crime. The Victoria Police have Farm Crime Liaison Officers that specialise in assisting with farm related crimes, however this is a voluntary role which forms part of an officer’s larger workload. By contrast, the New South Wales Police Force Rural Crime Prevention Team is a dedicated team consisting of specialised rural crime investigators and intelligence practitioners focused on proactive and preventative interventions in farm crime. Farmers in both states were surveyed regarding their awareness and engagement with these rural policing teams, and we examined how this may shape victimisation, reporting, worry and the relationships between police and farmers. In New South Wales, awareness and direct contact with rural crime police led to both increased satisfaction with police and crime reporting. Respondents with awareness of this team also express significantly less worry of crime, whilst those with direct contact did not. We conclude the article by discussing and contextualising these findings within rural criminology and considering ways forward for the policing of farm crime.","PeriodicalId":93767,"journal":{"name":"International journal of rural criminology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of rural criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ijrc.v7i1.9106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents select findings from ‘farm crime’ victimisation surveys undertaken in the two most populous Australian states of New South Wales and Victoria. We examine the findings in relation to farmer crime victimisation, their willingness to report crime, and their worry about crime, as well as farmer perspectives on policing generally and the policing of farm crime specifically. In both states, there are high levels of victimisation, high levels of worry, low- to mid-levels of confidence in the police, and there remains a gap between experiences of farm crime and reporting. Both states have police tasked specifically with addressing farm crime. The Victoria Police have Farm Crime Liaison Officers that specialise in assisting with farm related crimes, however this is a voluntary role which forms part of an officer’s larger workload. By contrast, the New South Wales Police Force Rural Crime Prevention Team is a dedicated team consisting of specialised rural crime investigators and intelligence practitioners focused on proactive and preventative interventions in farm crime. Farmers in both states were surveyed regarding their awareness and engagement with these rural policing teams, and we examined how this may shape victimisation, reporting, worry and the relationships between police and farmers. In New South Wales, awareness and direct contact with rural crime police led to both increased satisfaction with police and crime reporting. Respondents with awareness of this team also express significantly less worry of crime, whilst those with direct contact did not. We conclude the article by discussing and contextualising these findings within rural criminology and considering ways forward for the policing of farm crime.
澳大利亚农村的农场犯罪与农警关系
本文介绍了在澳大利亚人口最多的新南威尔士州和维多利亚州进行的“农场犯罪”受害调查的精选结果。我们研究了与农民犯罪受害、他们举报犯罪的意愿和他们对犯罪的担忧有关的调查结果,以及农民对一般治安和农场犯罪治安的看法。在这两个州,受害程度都很高,担忧程度也很高,对警察的信心也很低,农场犯罪的经历和报告之间仍然存在差距。这两个州都有专门负责处理农场犯罪的警察。维多利亚警方有农场犯罪联络官,专门协助处理与农场有关的犯罪,但这是一个自愿的角色,是警官更大工作量的一部分。相比之下,新南威尔士州警察部队农村犯罪预防小组是一个由专门的农村犯罪调查人员和情报从业人员组成的专门小组,专注于对农场犯罪进行积极和预防性干预。对这两个州的农民进行了关于他们对这些农村警务团队的认识和参与的调查,我们研究了这可能如何影响受害、报告、担忧以及警察和农民之间的关系。在新南威尔士州,提高认识和与农村犯罪警察的直接接触提高了人们对警察和犯罪报告的满意度。了解该团队的受访者对犯罪的担忧也明显减少,而直接接触的受访者则没有。最后,我们在农村犯罪学中讨论了这些发现并将其置于背景中,并考虑了农场犯罪监管的前进道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信