The meaning of ‘things’: The evolution of an ethic of care in the return of personal effects after disaster 2001–2019

Q3 Nursing
L. Easthope
{"title":"The meaning of ‘things’: The evolution of an ethic of care in the return of personal effects after disaster 2001–2019","authors":"L. Easthope","doi":"10.1080/02682621.2019.1679465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The right to the return of personal effects belonging to loved ones after sudden death requires both protection and promotion. It is a fragile ‘right’ that can easily be undermined, and may require support from policy and legislation. The author has championed the return of personal effects after bereavement throughout her career in disaster response and was influenced by early examples of poor treatment and destruction. This article provides an evaluation of the historic picture and a reflection on the ongoing work to ensure that property is protected and restored. It also discusses whether the UK now has an ‘ethic of care’ in this area. This piece considers a number of recent case studies drawing on the author’s own experiences of working on incidents between 2001 and the present day, with specific examination of the work of the Metropolitan Police’s Property Restoration Team in 2005.","PeriodicalId":44115,"journal":{"name":"Bereavement Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02682621.2019.1679465","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bereavement Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2019.1679465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The right to the return of personal effects belonging to loved ones after sudden death requires both protection and promotion. It is a fragile ‘right’ that can easily be undermined, and may require support from policy and legislation. The author has championed the return of personal effects after bereavement throughout her career in disaster response and was influenced by early examples of poor treatment and destruction. This article provides an evaluation of the historic picture and a reflection on the ongoing work to ensure that property is protected and restored. It also discusses whether the UK now has an ‘ethic of care’ in this area. This piece considers a number of recent case studies drawing on the author’s own experiences of working on incidents between 2001 and the present day, with specific examination of the work of the Metropolitan Police’s Property Restoration Team in 2005.
“事物”的含义:2001年至2019年灾难后个人物品归还中关怀伦理的演变
猝死后归还亲人个人物品的权利需要保护和促进。这是一项脆弱的“权利”,很容易受到破坏,可能需要政策和立法的支持。在她的救灾生涯中,提交人一直支持在丧亲之痛后归还个人物品,并受到早期恶劣待遇和破坏的影响。本文对这幅历史画卷进行了评估,并对正在进行的确保财产得到保护和修复的工作进行了反思。它还讨论了英国现在在这一领域是否有“关爱伦理”。这篇文章考虑了最近的一些案例研究,这些案例研究借鉴了作者自己在2001年至今处理事件的经验,并具体审查了伦敦警察局财产修复小组在2005年的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bereavement Care
Bereavement Care SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信