MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR EARLY-STAGE DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE THROUGH HANDWRITING DATA

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Matthew Dionela, Carey Louise B. Arroyo, Mhica S. Torres, Miguel P. Alaan, Sandy C. Lauguico, R. R. Vicerra, R. Concepcion II
{"title":"MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR EARLY-STAGE DIAGNOSIS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE THROUGH HANDWRITING DATA","authors":"Matthew Dionela, Carey Louise B. Arroyo, Mhica S. Torres, Miguel P. Alaan, Sandy C. Lauguico, R. R. Vicerra, R. Concepcion II","doi":"10.11113/aej.v13.18777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parkinson's disease (PD) deteriorates human cognitive and motor functions, causing slowness of movements and postural shakiness. PD is currently incurable, and managing symptoms in its late stages is difficult. PD diagnosis also has gaps in accuracy due to several clinical challenges. Thus, early-stage detection of PD through its symptoms, such as handwriting abnormality, has become a popular research area using machine learning. Since most related studies focus on advanced algorithms, this study aims to determine the classification accuracies of simpler classical models using the NewHandPD-NewMeander dataset. This study used the 9 features extracted from the meanders drawn by healthy participants and participants diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease and 3 features about the individual. The same features were reduced to the 8 best according to univariate selection and recursive feature elimination. The machine learning algorithms used for the models in this study are Logistic regression, Multilayer perceptron, and Naive Bayes. Additionally, hyperparameter optimization was done. Results have shown that feature selection improved the performances of the default model, while optimization had varying effects depending on the feature selection method used. Among 15 models built, Multilayer perceptron, which utilized top 8 features from univariate selection with default hyperparameters (MLPU8), performed best. It yielded an accuracy of 84.4% in cross-validation, 87.5% in holdout validation, and an F1-score of 87.5%. Remaining models had accuracies ranging from 81.4% - 84.4% in cross-validations and 82.5% - 85.0% in holdout validations. Other studies done on diagnosing PD using similar handwritten datasets resulted in lower accuracies of 87.14% and 77.38% despite utilizing complex algorithms for its models. This proved that the 15 models built using simple architecture can outperform complex classification methods. The 15 models built accurately classify meander data and can be used as an early assessment tool for detecting PD.","PeriodicalId":36749,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.18777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) deteriorates human cognitive and motor functions, causing slowness of movements and postural shakiness. PD is currently incurable, and managing symptoms in its late stages is difficult. PD diagnosis also has gaps in accuracy due to several clinical challenges. Thus, early-stage detection of PD through its symptoms, such as handwriting abnormality, has become a popular research area using machine learning. Since most related studies focus on advanced algorithms, this study aims to determine the classification accuracies of simpler classical models using the NewHandPD-NewMeander dataset. This study used the 9 features extracted from the meanders drawn by healthy participants and participants diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease and 3 features about the individual. The same features were reduced to the 8 best according to univariate selection and recursive feature elimination. The machine learning algorithms used for the models in this study are Logistic regression, Multilayer perceptron, and Naive Bayes. Additionally, hyperparameter optimization was done. Results have shown that feature selection improved the performances of the default model, while optimization had varying effects depending on the feature selection method used. Among 15 models built, Multilayer perceptron, which utilized top 8 features from univariate selection with default hyperparameters (MLPU8), performed best. It yielded an accuracy of 84.4% in cross-validation, 87.5% in holdout validation, and an F1-score of 87.5%. Remaining models had accuracies ranging from 81.4% - 84.4% in cross-validations and 82.5% - 85.0% in holdout validations. Other studies done on diagnosing PD using similar handwritten datasets resulted in lower accuracies of 87.14% and 77.38% despite utilizing complex algorithms for its models. This proved that the 15 models built using simple architecture can outperform complex classification methods. The 15 models built accurately classify meander data and can be used as an early assessment tool for detecting PD.
通过手写数据进行帕金森病早期诊断的机器学习方法
帕金森氏症(PD)使人的认知和运动功能恶化,导致运动缓慢和姿势颤抖。帕金森病目前是无法治愈的,在其晚期控制症状是困难的。由于一些临床挑战,PD诊断的准确性也存在差距。因此,通过PD的症状(如书写异常)进行早期检测已成为利用机器学习的热门研究领域。由于大多数相关研究都集中在高级算法上,因此本研究旨在使用NewHandPD-NewMeander数据集确定更简单的经典模型的分类精度。本研究使用了从健康参与者和诊断为帕金森病的参与者绘制的曲线图中提取的9个特征和3个关于个体的特征。通过单变量选择和递归特征剔除,将相同的特征减少到8个最佳特征。本研究中用于模型的机器学习算法是逻辑回归、多层感知器和朴素贝叶斯。此外,还进行了超参数优化。结果表明,特征选择提高了默认模型的性能,而优化的效果取决于所使用的特征选择方法。在构建的15个模型中,利用默认超参数单变量选择的前8个特征(MLPU8)的多层感知器表现最佳。交叉验证的准确率为84.4%,滞留验证的准确率为87.5%,f1评分为87.5%。其余模型在交叉验证中准确率为81.4% - 84.4%,在保留验证中准确率为82.5% - 85.0%。其他使用类似手写数据集诊断PD的研究尽管使用了复杂的模型算法,但准确率较低,分别为87.14%和77.38%。这证明了使用简单架构构建的15个模型优于复杂的分类方法。所建立的15个模型对曲流数据进行了准确分类,可作为PD检测的早期评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASEAN Engineering Journal
ASEAN Engineering Journal Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信