{"title":"CHURCHBUILDING AT BIDDENHAM AND BOLNEY RECONSIDERED","authors":"G. Bernard","doi":"10.1017/s0003581521000317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a paper on the north aisle of St James, Biddenham, Bedfordshire, published in The Antiquaries Journal in 2015, in a related paper on the west tower of Bolney, West Sussex, and in a recent book, Church Building and Society in the Later Middle Ages, Gabriel Byng has questioned the typicality of church-rebuilding single-handedly directed and financed by wealthy individuals such as the Sussex knight Sir William de Etchingham. In a close study of Bolney and Biddenham, Byng argues instead that church-rebuilding ‘was run and financed by comparatively wealthy groups of peasants or townsfolk’. The case rests on Byng’s assessment of unusual surviving sources, a series of informal accounts for Bolney and a draft contract for Biddenham. This paper offers a rather different reading, and questions Byng’s claim. The decisive role at both was played by the lords, John Bolney at Bolney, and Sir William Butler at Biddenham.","PeriodicalId":44308,"journal":{"name":"Antiquaries Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"252 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquaries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003581521000317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a paper on the north aisle of St James, Biddenham, Bedfordshire, published in The Antiquaries Journal in 2015, in a related paper on the west tower of Bolney, West Sussex, and in a recent book, Church Building and Society in the Later Middle Ages, Gabriel Byng has questioned the typicality of church-rebuilding single-handedly directed and financed by wealthy individuals such as the Sussex knight Sir William de Etchingham. In a close study of Bolney and Biddenham, Byng argues instead that church-rebuilding ‘was run and financed by comparatively wealthy groups of peasants or townsfolk’. The case rests on Byng’s assessment of unusual surviving sources, a series of informal accounts for Bolney and a draft contract for Biddenham. This paper offers a rather different reading, and questions Byng’s claim. The decisive role at both was played by the lords, John Bolney at Bolney, and Sir William Butler at Biddenham.
在2015年发表在《古董杂志》上的一篇关于贝德福德郡比登纳姆圣詹姆斯北走廊的论文中,在一篇关于西萨塞克斯郡博尔尼西塔的相关论文中,以及在最近出版的一本书《中世纪后期的教堂建筑与社会》中,Gabriel Byng质疑由苏塞克斯骑士William de Etchinham爵士等富人独自指挥和资助的教堂重建的典型性。在对Bolney和Biddenham的仔细研究中,Byng认为教堂重建“是由相对富裕的农民或市民团体管理和资助的”。本案基于Byng对不寻常的幸存来源的评估、Bolney的一系列非正式账目以及Biddenham的合同草案。这篇论文提供了一种截然不同的解读,并对Byng的说法提出了质疑。在这两个职位上的决定性角色都是由领主们扮演的,约翰·博尔尼在博尔尼,威廉·巴特勒爵士在比登纳姆。