Application of Bi-factor MIRT and Higher-order CDM Models to an In-house EFL Listening Test for Diagnostic Purposes

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Shangchao Min, Hongwen Cai, Lianzhen He
{"title":"Application of Bi-factor MIRT and Higher-order CDM Models to an In-house EFL Listening Test for Diagnostic Purposes","authors":"Shangchao Min, Hongwen Cai, Lianzhen He","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2021.1980571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study examined the performance of the bi-factor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model and higher-order (HO) cognitive diagnostic models (CDM) in providing diagnostic information and general ability estimation simultaneously in a listening test. The data used were 1,611 examinees’ item-level responses to an in-house EFL listening test in China and five content experts’ item-attribute coding results of the test form. The bi-factor MIRT model was compared with five CDMs with and without a higher-order structure in terms of model fit, attribute classification and general ability estimation. The results showed that the bi-factor MIRT model provided the best model-data fit, followed by the HO-G-DINA model, the saturated G-DINA model, and other reduced CDMs. The HO-G-DINA model produced attribute classification results more similar to the G-DINA model, whereas the bi-factor MIRT model offered better results in discriminating examinees’ general listening ability. The findings of this study highlighted the feasibility of using the bi-factor MIRT model as an attractive alternative for diagnostic assessment, especially in language assessment where attributes are assumed to be continuous.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1980571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study examined the performance of the bi-factor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model and higher-order (HO) cognitive diagnostic models (CDM) in providing diagnostic information and general ability estimation simultaneously in a listening test. The data used were 1,611 examinees’ item-level responses to an in-house EFL listening test in China and five content experts’ item-attribute coding results of the test form. The bi-factor MIRT model was compared with five CDMs with and without a higher-order structure in terms of model fit, attribute classification and general ability estimation. The results showed that the bi-factor MIRT model provided the best model-data fit, followed by the HO-G-DINA model, the saturated G-DINA model, and other reduced CDMs. The HO-G-DINA model produced attribute classification results more similar to the G-DINA model, whereas the bi-factor MIRT model offered better results in discriminating examinees’ general listening ability. The findings of this study highlighted the feasibility of using the bi-factor MIRT model as an attractive alternative for diagnostic assessment, especially in language assessment where attributes are assumed to be continuous.
双因素MIRT和高阶CDM模型在诊断性英语听力测试中的应用
摘要本研究考察了双因素多维项目反应理论(MIRT)模型和高阶认知诊断模型(CDM)在听力测试中同时提供诊断信息和一般能力估计的性能。使用的数据是1611名考生对国内英语听力测试的项目级回答和5位内容专家对测试表格的项目属性编码结果。在模型拟合、属性分类和一般能力估计方面,比较了双因素MIRT模型与5种不含高阶结构的cdm模型。结果表明,双因子MIRT模型提供了最佳的模型数据拟合,其次是HO-G-DINA模型,饱和G-DINA模型和其他减少的CDMs。HO-G-DINA模型的属性分类结果更接近G-DINA模型,而双因素MIRT模型在区分考生一般听力能力方面效果更好。这项研究的结果强调了使用双因素MIRT模型作为诊断评估的一个有吸引力的替代方案的可行性,特别是在假设属性是连续的语言评估中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信