Psychometric Properties of a Safety Culture Index among Mental Health Workers in Ghana

Q3 Medicine
Jacob Owusu Sarfo, Edward Wilson Ansah, D. Apaak, Rafael Valdece Sousa Bastos
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of a Safety Culture Index among Mental Health Workers in Ghana","authors":"Jacob Owusu Sarfo, Edward Wilson Ansah, D. Apaak, Rafael Valdece Sousa Bastos","doi":"10.20471/dec.2023.59.02.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety culture among mental health workers is essential, especially in developing countries where workplace safety seems neglected. However, few studies have provided detailed psychometric analyses of convenient safety instruments with practical relevance for the healthcare industry in the Sub-Saharan African context. We sampled 574 (54.4 % females, 45.6 % males) mental health workers from three Specialist Psychiatric Teaching Hospitals in Ghana. Initially, we collected data using adapted items from Edkins and Coakes’ 25-item Airline Safety Culture Index (ASCI). Consequently, we conducted a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the Diagonally Weighted Least Squares estimator. We also used the item reduction analysis (Gradual Response Model) to reduce the adapted 25-item scale to 11 items (Modified Safety Culture Index, MSCI- 11). Finally, we conducted reliability analyses (alpha and omega) for the MSCI-11. We observed that the data in the CFA showed adequate fit indices [χ2 (df = 44, N = 574) = 223.752, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.975; TLI = 0.968; RM- SEA = 0.084 (CI 90 % 0.074- 0.096); SRMR = 0.063]. The MSCI- 11 is parsimonious and has good reliability estimates [α = 0.853 (95 % CI 0.835 – 0.870) and ω = 0.853 (95 % CI 0.837- 0.087)]. Future studies should use additional cross-validation in other high-risk jobs to generalise the new scale.","PeriodicalId":8294,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/dec.2023.59.02.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety culture among mental health workers is essential, especially in developing countries where workplace safety seems neglected. However, few studies have provided detailed psychometric analyses of convenient safety instruments with practical relevance for the healthcare industry in the Sub-Saharan African context. We sampled 574 (54.4 % females, 45.6 % males) mental health workers from three Specialist Psychiatric Teaching Hospitals in Ghana. Initially, we collected data using adapted items from Edkins and Coakes’ 25-item Airline Safety Culture Index (ASCI). Consequently, we conducted a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the Diagonally Weighted Least Squares estimator. We also used the item reduction analysis (Gradual Response Model) to reduce the adapted 25-item scale to 11 items (Modified Safety Culture Index, MSCI- 11). Finally, we conducted reliability analyses (alpha and omega) for the MSCI-11. We observed that the data in the CFA showed adequate fit indices [χ2 (df = 44, N = 574) = 223.752, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.975; TLI = 0.968; RM- SEA = 0.084 (CI 90 % 0.074- 0.096); SRMR = 0.063]. The MSCI- 11 is parsimonious and has good reliability estimates [α = 0.853 (95 % CI 0.835 – 0.870) and ω = 0.853 (95 % CI 0.837- 0.087)]. Future studies should use additional cross-validation in other high-risk jobs to generalise the new scale.
加纳精神卫生工作者安全文化指数的心理测量特性
精神卫生工作者的安全文化至关重要,特别是在工作场所安全似乎被忽视的发展中国家。然而,很少有研究为撒哈拉以南非洲地区的医疗保健行业提供了具有实际意义的便利安全仪器的详细心理测量分析。我们从加纳的三家专科精神病学教学医院抽取了574名精神卫生工作者(54.4%为女性,45.6%为男性)。最初,我们使用Edkins和Coakes的25项航空安全文化指数(ASCI)的改编项目收集数据。因此,我们使用对角线加权最小二乘估计量进行了验证性因子分析(CFA)。我们还使用项目减少分析(渐进反应模型)将适应的25项量表减少到11项(修正安全文化指数,MSCI- 11)。最后,我们对MSCI-11进行了信度分析(alpha和omega)。我们观察到CFA中的数据具有足够的拟合指数[χ2 (df = 44, N = 574) = 223.752, p < 0.001;Cfi = 0.975;Tli = 0.968;Rm - sea = 0.084 (ci 90% = 0.074- 0.096);SRMR = 0.063]。MSCI- 11是简约的,具有良好的可靠性估计[α = 0.853 (95% CI 0.835 - 0.870)和ω = 0.853 (95% CI 0.837- 0.087)]。未来的研究应该在其他高风险工作中使用额外的交叉验证来推广新的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Psychiatry Research
Archives of Psychiatry Research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信