The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
G. Dodds
{"title":"The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power","authors":"G. Dodds","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2023.2237815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of this future utopia. The path that would take us from here (capitalism) to there (degrowth) is in fact not entirely clear. Considering the immense scale of this challenge, this should not be considered a major shortcoming. Additionally, the same could be said for the majority of Degrowth publications that share an orientation to future planning. How are the strategies described supposed to be integrated, scaled up (or down), and adjusted to different contexts? What role do political institutions play into the transition to Degrowth? The book does not provide fully satisfying answers to these key questions. For example, very little is said about the role of the state in bringing about change. It is also striking that the authors almost brush over their contention that “it is not at all clear under which conditions and based on what balance of social forces elites would give up their privileges, which are built on uneven development and global injustice and backed up by military might” (291). Overall though, while some readers might object to the lack of thorough political analysis, the book’s aim is not to be exhaustive but rather to convince that degrowth is a possible and desirable future, and to invite others to develop their own like-minded solutions. In this respect, the authors’ effort should be praised—even more so if scholars from different disciplines take on the challenge to fill the gaps in this book with more detailed proposals.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"563 - 565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2237815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

of this future utopia. The path that would take us from here (capitalism) to there (degrowth) is in fact not entirely clear. Considering the immense scale of this challenge, this should not be considered a major shortcoming. Additionally, the same could be said for the majority of Degrowth publications that share an orientation to future planning. How are the strategies described supposed to be integrated, scaled up (or down), and adjusted to different contexts? What role do political institutions play into the transition to Degrowth? The book does not provide fully satisfying answers to these key questions. For example, very little is said about the role of the state in bringing about change. It is also striking that the authors almost brush over their contention that “it is not at all clear under which conditions and based on what balance of social forces elites would give up their privileges, which are built on uneven development and global injustice and backed up by military might” (291). Overall though, while some readers might object to the lack of thorough political analysis, the book’s aim is not to be exhaustive but rather to convince that degrowth is a possible and desirable future, and to invite others to develop their own like-minded solutions. In this respect, the authors’ effort should be praised—even more so if scholars from different disciplines take on the challenge to fill the gaps in this book with more detailed proposals.
独裁的幽灵:总统权力的司法授权
这个未来乌托邦。事实上,我们从这里(资本主义)到那里(衰退)的道路并不完全清楚。考虑到这一挑战的巨大规模,这不应被视为一个重大缺点。此外,Degrowth的大多数出版物也可以这样说,它们都有未来规划的方向。所描述的策略应该如何整合、扩大(或缩小)并根据不同的背景进行调整?政治机构在向德格罗斯过渡的过程中扮演了什么角色?这本书并没有为这些关键问题提供完全令人满意的答案。例如,很少有人谈论国家在带来变革方面的作用。同样令人震惊的是,作者们几乎忽略了他们的论点,即“根本不清楚精英们会在什么条件下,基于什么样的社会力量平衡,放弃他们的特权,这些特权建立在不均衡发展和全球不公正的基础上,并得到军事力量的支持”(291)。不过,总的来说,尽管一些读者可能会反对缺乏彻底的政治分析,但这本书的目的并不是详尽无遗,而是说服人们相信衰退是一个可能和可取的未来,并邀请其他人制定自己志同道合的解决方案。在这方面,作者的努力应该受到赞扬——如果来自不同学科的学者接受挑战,用更详细的建议填补本书的空白,那就更应该受到赞扬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信