Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration plus Cholecystectomy versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography plus Cholecystectomy for Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis

R. Yadav, B. Purbey, S. Yadav, Bhupendra Charan Shrestha, N. Paudyal, K. R. Yadav, A. Bhattarai
{"title":"Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration plus Cholecystectomy versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography plus Cholecystectomy for Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis","authors":"R. Yadav, B. Purbey, S. Yadav, Bhupendra Charan Shrestha, N. Paudyal, K. R. Yadav, A. Bhattarai","doi":"10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The management of concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones have been debated between both endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques. \nObjective: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, cost and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus cholecystectomy. \nMethodology: This is a comparative interventional study carried out among 62 patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. The study population was divided into two groups by simple randomized sampling technique (lottery technique). Group A underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in one stage (single-staged management). Group B underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in second hospital visit (two-staged management). \nResults: Complete clearance of the stone with a single attempt was achieved in Group A compared to Group B as 8 patients had  gone for a second attempt in group B. Post operative pancreatitis was higher i.e. 24(77.41%) in Group B with statically significance (p value <0.005). Other complications like bleeding i.e. 29(93.54% in A and 26(83.87%) in B group, perforation was also noted during the study period that includes 29(93.54%) in B group. The mean operative time was longer in Group A i.e. 130.2 ± 41.5 minutes while in Group B was 78.5± 10.2 minutes which was statistically significant (p <0.001).The cost of procedure was higher for patients undergoing two-staged management.   \nConclusion: The complete clearance of the stone with a single attempt was achieved in Group A compared to Group B where 8 patients had a second attempt. Also incidence of pancreatitis was higher in Group B and statically significant. Other complications like bleeding perforation was also noted during the study period in B group. The mean operative time was longer in Group A which was statistically significant. However, for those patients with concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones, single-staged management consisting of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be the preferred method of treatment where the expertise and facilities are available.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v7i3.52770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The management of concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones have been debated between both endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, cost and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus cholecystectomy. Methodology: This is a comparative interventional study carried out among 62 patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. The study population was divided into two groups by simple randomized sampling technique (lottery technique). Group A underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in one stage (single-staged management). Group B underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in second hospital visit (two-staged management). Results: Complete clearance of the stone with a single attempt was achieved in Group A compared to Group B as 8 patients had  gone for a second attempt in group B. Post operative pancreatitis was higher i.e. 24(77.41%) in Group B with statically significance (p value <0.005). Other complications like bleeding i.e. 29(93.54% in A and 26(83.87%) in B group, perforation was also noted during the study period that includes 29(93.54%) in B group. The mean operative time was longer in Group A i.e. 130.2 ± 41.5 minutes while in Group B was 78.5± 10.2 minutes which was statistically significant (p <0.001).The cost of procedure was higher for patients undergoing two-staged management.   Conclusion: The complete clearance of the stone with a single attempt was achieved in Group A compared to Group B where 8 patients had a second attempt. Also incidence of pancreatitis was higher in Group B and statically significant. Other complications like bleeding perforation was also noted during the study period in B group. The mean operative time was longer in Group A which was statistically significant. However, for those patients with concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones, single-staged management consisting of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be the preferred method of treatment where the expertise and facilities are available.
腹腔镜胆总管探查加胆囊切除术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影加胆囊切除治疗胆囊胆总管综合征的比较研究
引言:内镜和腹腔镜技术对合并胆囊和胆总管结石的处理一直存在争议。目的:比较腹腔镜胆总管探查加胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影加胆囊切除的疗效、安全性、成本和手术效果。方法:这是一项对62例合并胆结石和胆总管结石患者进行的比较介入研究。采用简单随机抽样技术(抽签技术)将研究人群分为两组。A组采用腹腔镜胆总管探查术,然后进行一期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(单期处理)。B组在第二次医院就诊时接受了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术,然后进行了腹腔镜胆囊切除术(两阶段治疗)。结果:与B组相比,a组一次结石完全清除,因为B组有8名患者进行了第二次结石清除。术后胰腺炎发生率更高,即B组24例(77.41%),具有静态意义(p值<0.005)。其他并发症如出血,即a组29例(93.54%)和B组26例(83.87%),在研究期间也注意到穿孔,其中B组29例(93.54%)。A组的平均手术时间较长,即130.2±41.5分钟,而B组为78.5±10.2分钟,具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。接受两阶段治疗的患者的手术成本较高。结论:与B组8名患者第二次尝试相比,a组一次尝试即可完全清除结石。另外,B组的胰腺炎发病率较高,具有统计学意义。在研究期间,B组也注意到其他并发症,如出血性穿孔。A组平均手术时间较长,具有统计学意义。然而,对于那些合并胆囊和胆总管结石的患者,在有专业知识和设施的情况下,由腹腔镜胆总管探查和腹腔镜胆囊切除术组成的单阶段治疗可能是首选的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信