Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa

L. Mugwedi, Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee, K. Roy, Benis N. Egoh, F. Pouzols, E. Douwes, R. Boon, S. O’Donoghue, R. Slotow, E. Di Minin, A. Moilanen, M. Rouget
{"title":"Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa","authors":"L. Mugwedi, Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee, K. Roy, Benis N. Egoh, F. Pouzols, E. Douwes, R. Boon, S. O’Donoghue, R. Slotow, E. Di Minin, A. Moilanen, M. Rouget","doi":"10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Effective planning of a large-scale restoration project is challenging, because of the range of factors that need to be considered (e.g. restoration of multiple habitats with varying degradation levels, multiple restoration goals and limited conservation resources). Ecological restoration planning studies typically focus on biodiversity and ecosystem services, rather than employment and other co-benefits. Robust Offsetting (RobOff), a restoration planning tool, was used in a forest restoration project in Durban, South Africa, to plan forest restoration considering a mosaic of habitats with varying levels of degradation, diverse restoration actions, a limited budget and multiple (biodiversity, carbon stock and employment) goals. To achieve this, the restoration action currently being implemented (= current action) was compared to three restoration alternatives. The three restoration alternatives included (1) natural regeneration action; (2) carbon action; and (3) biodiversity action. The results supported biodiversity action as most beneficial in terms of maximizing biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. Results showed that investing in biodiversity action is preferable to the status quo. RobOff ensured optimal allocation of limited resources to actions and habitats that have a potential to achieve higher biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation.","PeriodicalId":31680,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"132 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effective planning of a large-scale restoration project is challenging, because of the range of factors that need to be considered (e.g. restoration of multiple habitats with varying degradation levels, multiple restoration goals and limited conservation resources). Ecological restoration planning studies typically focus on biodiversity and ecosystem services, rather than employment and other co-benefits. Robust Offsetting (RobOff), a restoration planning tool, was used in a forest restoration project in Durban, South Africa, to plan forest restoration considering a mosaic of habitats with varying levels of degradation, diverse restoration actions, a limited budget and multiple (biodiversity, carbon stock and employment) goals. To achieve this, the restoration action currently being implemented (= current action) was compared to three restoration alternatives. The three restoration alternatives included (1) natural regeneration action; (2) carbon action; and (3) biodiversity action. The results supported biodiversity action as most beneficial in terms of maximizing biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. Results showed that investing in biodiversity action is preferable to the status quo. RobOff ensured optimal allocation of limited resources to actions and habitats that have a potential to achieve higher biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation.
南非德班市缓解和适应气候变化的恢复规划
由于需要考虑一系列因素(例如,恢复不同退化程度的多个栖息地,多个恢复目标和有限的保护资源),大规模恢复项目的有效规划具有挑战性。生态恢复规划研究通常侧重于生物多样性和生态系统服务,而不是就业和其他协同效益。鲁棒补偿(Robust Offsetting, RobOff)是一种恢复规划工具,用于南非德班的一个森林恢复项目,该项目考虑了不同退化程度的栖息地、不同的恢复行动、有限的预算和多个(生物多样性、碳储量和就业)目标,对森林恢复进行规划。为了实现这一点,将当前正在执行的恢复操作(=当前操作)与三个恢复备选方案进行比较。三种恢复方案包括:(1)自然再生行动;(2)碳作用;(3)生物多样性行动。研究结果支持生物多样性行动在最大限度地提高生物多样性、碳储存和创造就业机会方面是最有益的。结果表明,投资于生物多样性行动比现状更可取。RobOff确保将有限的资源优化分配给有可能实现更高生物多样性、碳储存和创造就业机会的行动和栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书