Evaluation of Prescribing Patterns Following Surgical Procedures in Opioid Naïve Patients at a Veterans Affairs Teaching Hospital.

Caleb Chitwood, Karlie L Haug, Cody Wenthur, Carly Gillis, James D Maloney, Diane Johnson
{"title":"Evaluation of Prescribing Patterns Following Surgical Procedures in Opioid Naïve Patients at a Veterans Affairs Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Caleb Chitwood, Karlie L Haug, Cody Wenthur, Carly Gillis, James D Maloney, Diane Johnson","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate facility postoperative opioid prescribing patterns in comparison to published guidelines and adherence to opioid safety mandates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality analysis was performed between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients were identified to have been opioid naïve prior to receiving a new opioid prescription postoperatively during the study period. Patient charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted to collect desired data. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate distributions of morphine equivalent daily dose and opioid day supply prescribed across study subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four of 100 prescriptions evaluated were determined to be within quantity or duration recommendations of the selected guideline. Statistical analysis found no significantly different distributions between the duration and quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-specific risk factors. Forty-eight patients did not use the entire quantity of the initial opioid prescription dispensed. Of those patients, 26 still had opioids within the home. Opioid risk review documentation was completed in 19 of 65 patients indicated for documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most opioid prescriptions provided within the study period aligned with recommendations from author-selected guidelines. However, a review of risk prior to opioid prescribing frequently was not performed. The number of patients utilizing less than 50% of prescribed opioids, and few refills indicate that reductions in opioids prescribed would improve safety for both patients and the surrounding community without increasing the risk for the under-treatment of postoperative pain. Improved prescribing habits and patient safety will be targeted through provider education regarding risk review documentation in opioid naïve patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate facility postoperative opioid prescribing patterns in comparison to published guidelines and adherence to opioid safety mandates.

Methods: This quality analysis was performed between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients were identified to have been opioid naïve prior to receiving a new opioid prescription postoperatively during the study period. Patient charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted to collect desired data. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate distributions of morphine equivalent daily dose and opioid day supply prescribed across study subpopulations.

Results: Ninety-four of 100 prescriptions evaluated were determined to be within quantity or duration recommendations of the selected guideline. Statistical analysis found no significantly different distributions between the duration and quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-specific risk factors. Forty-eight patients did not use the entire quantity of the initial opioid prescription dispensed. Of those patients, 26 still had opioids within the home. Opioid risk review documentation was completed in 19 of 65 patients indicated for documentation.

Conclusion: Most opioid prescriptions provided within the study period aligned with recommendations from author-selected guidelines. However, a review of risk prior to opioid prescribing frequently was not performed. The number of patients utilizing less than 50% of prescribed opioids, and few refills indicate that reductions in opioids prescribed would improve safety for both patients and the surrounding community without increasing the risk for the under-treatment of postoperative pain. Improved prescribing habits and patient safety will be targeted through provider education regarding risk review documentation in opioid naïve patients.

退伍军人事务教学医院阿片类药物手术后处方模式评价Naïve患者。
目的与已公布的指南和阿片类药物安全规定的遵守情况进行比较,评估机构术后阿片类药品的处方模式。方法本质量分析于2019年11月至2020年3月进行。在研究期间,患者在术后接受新的阿片类药物处方之前被确定为阿片类天真。对病历表进行了审查,并联系患者以收集所需的数据。进行统计分析以评估研究亚群中吗啡当量日剂量和阿片类药物日供应的分布。结果在评估的100个处方中,有4个被确定在所选指南的数量或持续时间建议范围内。统计分析发现,出院时开具的阿片类药物的持续时间和数量与患者特定风险因素之间的分布没有显著差异。四十八名患者没有使用最初开具的阿片类药物处方的全部剂量。在这些患者中,有26人家中仍有阿片类药物。阿片类药物风险审查文件在65名需要文件记录的患者中完成了19名。结论研究期间提供的大多数阿片类药物处方符合作者选择的指南中的建议。然而,在经常开阿片类药物处方之前没有对风险进行审查。使用处方阿片类药物的患者数量不到50%,而且很少再补充,这表明减少处方阿片样药物将提高患者和周围社区的安全性,而不会增加术后疼痛治疗不足的风险。将通过提供者关于阿片类药物天真患者风险审查文件的教育,改善处方习惯和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信