A randomised phase II trial of intra-dermal G-CSF infiltration in radiation induced skin reactions

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar
{"title":"A randomised phase II trial of intra-dermal G-CSF infiltration in radiation induced skin reactions","authors":"Sumana Maiti Das, A. Bose, Suparna Kanti Pal, Suman Meyur, Siddhartha Das, Aloke Ghosh Dastidar","doi":"10.51248/.v43i3.736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.\n \nMaterials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.\n \nResults: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days  time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).\n \nConclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.","PeriodicalId":51650,"journal":{"name":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i3.736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Radiation induced skin reactions (RISR) often delays the treatment affecting compliance and outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to recruit dermo-genic stem cells and help in healing. Very few studies are there to evaluate its potential in this regard. This study evaluates intradermal infiltration of G-CSF for its effectiveness, effect on treatment delay and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment for grade 3/4 RISR.   Materials and Methods: Patients experiencing advanced RISR due to any regimen of external beam radiation above 50 Gy of 2 Gy equivalent doses were randomized to undergo treatment either with intradermal G-CSF infiltration at margin and bases of lesion along with conventional therapies or with only conventional anti-inflammatory/ antibiotic therapy. The experimental arm and the control arm had 62 and 60 patients respectively analyzed for time taken for re-epithelization and treatment delay. Also.pre and two weeks post-treatment global quality of life and pain scores were taken for qualitative comparison between the arms.   Results: G-CSF arm took a mean 5.2 (95percent CI=4.4-5.7) days, significantly less than conventional treatment arm (Mean=7.5 days, 95percent CI= 6.8-8.1,p=0.002) for re-epithelization. Grade of toxicity adjusted hazard ratio of non-resolution in 10 days  time was 2.98 for the control arm over the experimental arm(p=.046). Treatment gap was significantly less in the G-CSF arm (48.4 percent vs 68.3percent, p=0.026), with average delay of treatment being significantly reduced (p 0.001). A ten-day delay adjusted survival was significantly better in the experimental arm (Mantel-Cox Log rank test, X2=12.26, p 0.001).   Conclusion: Intradermal perilesional G-CSF infiltration for advanced RISR hastens wound healing compared to conventional treatment and significantly reduces the chances of treatment delay.
辐射诱发皮肤反应中皮内G-CSF浸润的随机II期试验
引言和目的:辐射诱导的皮肤反应(RISR)通常会延迟治疗,影响依从性和结果。众所周知,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可以募集成皮干细胞并帮助愈合。很少有研究评估其在这方面的潜力。与传统治疗3/4级RISR相比,本研究评估了G-CSF的皮内浸润的有效性、对治疗延迟和生活质量的影响。材料和方法:因2 Gy当量剂量的50 Gy以上的任何外照射方案而经历晚期RISR的患者被随机接受治疗,要么在病变边缘和基底进行皮内G-CSF浸润,要么接受常规治疗,要么只接受常规抗炎/抗生素治疗。实验组和对照组分别有62名和60名患者分析了再上皮化和治疗延迟所需的时间。Also.在治疗前和治疗后两周,对各组的整体生活质量和疼痛评分进行定性比较。结果:G-CSF组再上皮化平均耗时5.2天(95%可信区间4.4-5.7),明显少于常规治疗组(平均7.5天,95%可信区间6.8-8.1,p=0.002)。对照组与实验组相比,10天内未消退的毒性调整危险比为2.98(p=0.046)。G-CSF组的治疗差距显著较小(48.4%对68.3%,p=0.026),平均治疗延迟显著减少(p 0.001)。实验组10天延迟调整后的生存率显著提高(Mantel-Cox-Log秩检验,X2=12.26,p 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMedicine-Taiwan
BioMedicine-Taiwan MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信