Reflections On the Use of Complexity-Appropriate Computational Modeling for Public Policy Evaluation in the UK

Peter Barbrook-Johnson, Corey Schimpf, B. Castellani
{"title":"Reflections On the Use of Complexity-Appropriate Computational Modeling for Public Policy Evaluation in the UK","authors":"Peter Barbrook-Johnson, Corey Schimpf, B. Castellani","doi":"10.18278/JPCS.5.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the UK, calls for the application of insights from the study of complex adaptive systems to public policy evaluation are beginning to be taken seriously in government. Policymakers and analysts are accepting the fallibility of overly simplistic, definitive, or linear analysis, or are finding traditional forms of analysis and evidence less appropriate or feasible. Through our work in CECAN (the Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus), we reflect on our experiences and the practical challenges of using complexity-appropriate computational modeling with policy analysts and evaluators in UK central government. As an example, we discuss our work with the COMPLEX-IT toolkit, which uses a selection of case-based computational modeling approaches. We end by suggesting ways forward for applied complexity scientists, and policy evaluators and analysts to make more effective use of these methods.","PeriodicalId":93603,"journal":{"name":"Policy and complex systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and complex systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18278/JPCS.5.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In the UK, calls for the application of insights from the study of complex adaptive systems to public policy evaluation are beginning to be taken seriously in government. Policymakers and analysts are accepting the fallibility of overly simplistic, definitive, or linear analysis, or are finding traditional forms of analysis and evidence less appropriate or feasible. Through our work in CECAN (the Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus), we reflect on our experiences and the practical challenges of using complexity-appropriate computational modeling with policy analysts and evaluators in UK central government. As an example, we discuss our work with the COMPLEX-IT toolkit, which uses a selection of case-based computational modeling approaches. We end by suggesting ways forward for applied complexity scientists, and policy evaluators and analysts to make more effective use of these methods.
关于在英国公共政策评估中使用适合复杂性的计算模型的思考
在英国,政府开始认真对待将复杂适应系统研究的见解应用于公共政策评估的呼吁。政策制定者和分析人士正在接受过于简单化、确定性或线性分析的不可靠性,或者发现传统形式的分析和证据不太合适或可行。通过我们在CECAN(跨网络复杂性评估中心)的工作,我们反思了我们的经验和与英国中央政府的政策分析师和评估人员一起使用适合复杂性的计算模型的实际挑战。作为一个例子,我们讨论了我们使用COMPLEX-IT工具包的工作,该工具包使用了一系列基于案例的计算建模方法。最后,我们为应用复杂性科学家、政策评估人员和分析人员提出了更有效地利用这些方法的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信