Recording, Reporting, and Utilizing School Attendance Data in Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Norway: A Nordic Comparison

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Sandhaug, Iines Palmu, Sarah Jakobsen, J. Strömbeck, Maren-Johanne Nordby, Peter Friberg, Jenny Berg, Lotte Fensbo, Jenny Sjöström, Mikael Thastum
{"title":"Recording, Reporting, and Utilizing School Attendance Data in Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Norway: A Nordic Comparison","authors":"M. Sandhaug, Iines Palmu, Sarah Jakobsen, J. Strömbeck, Maren-Johanne Nordby, Peter Friberg, Jenny Berg, Lotte Fensbo, Jenny Sjöström, Mikael Thastum","doi":"10.14712/23363177.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The compulsory educational context and school systems within the Nordic countries Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Norway share fundamental similarities, facilitating comparison across these countries. In this study, we describe and compare existing practices of recording, reporting, and utilizing school attendance data in four countries. In Sweden, Finland, and Norway there is a lack of national guidelines and agreements of how to record, report, and use school attendance data. Municipal autonomy has led to a variety of recording and reporting practices, which then lead to lack of comparable data and wider use of the data gathered. Denmark has a national registry of attendance data, and schools are required to report the data to municipal level. There are more specific guidelines regarding recording and reporting in Denmark compared to Sweden, Finland, and Norway. Problems with school non-attendance are well recognized in the North, but ways of recording and responding to absenteeism are still versatile. This leads to inconsistencies both within and between the countries. Due to variations of the way attendance is recorded, the quality of the national registry of data in Denmark can be questioned. A unified approach to inform research and practice to include formalized definitions of school absence in the Nordic Education Acts are suggested. It requires schools to record and report attendance data within a national register and finding a reliable way to differentiate problematic from non-problematic absenteeism.","PeriodicalId":38228,"journal":{"name":"Orbis Scholae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis Scholae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The compulsory educational context and school systems within the Nordic countries Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Norway share fundamental similarities, facilitating comparison across these countries. In this study, we describe and compare existing practices of recording, reporting, and utilizing school attendance data in four countries. In Sweden, Finland, and Norway there is a lack of national guidelines and agreements of how to record, report, and use school attendance data. Municipal autonomy has led to a variety of recording and reporting practices, which then lead to lack of comparable data and wider use of the data gathered. Denmark has a national registry of attendance data, and schools are required to report the data to municipal level. There are more specific guidelines regarding recording and reporting in Denmark compared to Sweden, Finland, and Norway. Problems with school non-attendance are well recognized in the North, but ways of recording and responding to absenteeism are still versatile. This leads to inconsistencies both within and between the countries. Due to variations of the way attendance is recorded, the quality of the national registry of data in Denmark can be questioned. A unified approach to inform research and practice to include formalized definitions of school absence in the Nordic Education Acts are suggested. It requires schools to record and report attendance data within a national register and finding a reliable way to differentiate problematic from non-problematic absenteeism.
记录、报告和利用瑞典、芬兰、丹麦和挪威的学校出勤数据:北欧比较
北欧国家瑞典、芬兰、丹麦和挪威的义务教育背景和学校制度有着根本的相似之处,有助于这些国家之间的比较。在这项研究中,我们描述并比较了四个国家记录、报告和利用出勤数据的现有做法。在瑞典、芬兰和挪威,缺乏关于如何记录、报告和使用入学率数据的国家指导方针和协议。市政自治导致了各种记录和报告做法,从而导致缺乏可比数据,并更广泛地使用所收集的数据。丹麦有一个全国入学数据登记处,学校必须向市级报告数据。与瑞典、芬兰和挪威相比,丹麦有更具体的记录和报告指南。在北方,旷课问题得到了很好的认识,但记录和应对旷课的方法仍然多种多样。这导致了国家内部和国家之间的不一致。由于出勤记录方式的差异,丹麦国家数据登记处的质量可能会受到质疑。建议采用统一的方法为研究和实践提供信息,在《北欧教育法》中纳入正式的缺课定义。它要求学校在国家登记册中记录和报告出勤数据,并找到一种可靠的方法来区分有问题的缺勤和没有问题的缺勤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orbis Scholae
Orbis Scholae Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信