Gender-based differences in game-related statistics between winning and losing teams in an amateur handball league

IF 0.9 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Acta Gymnica Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI:10.5507/ag.2022.001
Sveinn Þorgeirsson, M. Pic, Demetrio Lozano, Ó. Sigurgeirsson, D. Sekulić, J. Saavedra
{"title":"Gender-based differences in game-related statistics between winning and losing teams in an amateur handball league","authors":"Sveinn Þorgeirsson, M. Pic, Demetrio Lozano, Ó. Sigurgeirsson, D. Sekulić, J. Saavedra","doi":"10.5507/ag.2022.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The literature on performance analysis in team handball has increased at the top level, but there has been far less research published at the amateur level. Objective: The objectives of the present study were: (i) to compare handball game-related statistics by match result (winning and losing teams) for the men’s and women’s teams in an amateur league, (ii) to compare handball game-related statistics by gender, and (iii) to identify characteristics that discriminated performance in amateur men and women handball leagues. Methods: The game-related statistics of the 190 matches (113 men, 77 women) played in the 2018/19 Icelandic League by 12 men and 8 women teams were analysed. Their intraand inter-observer internal consistency and reliability were at levels considered to be good or very good for the games of both genders. Differences in the game statistics between match outcomes (winning or losing teams for each gender) and between the genders were determined using the unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and the corresponding effect sizes were calculated. Results: Large differences between the winning and losing teams were shown by shots, goalkeeper blocked shots, and 9 m shots for men, and by shots, goalkeeper blocked shots and 7 m shots for women. In the comparison between the genders, there were four variables that showed a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d > 0.50). A discriminant analysis applying the sample-splitting method was performed for each gender to determine the game statistics that best characterized the match outcomes. The resulting predictive models correctly classified 84% of the matches using five variables for men and 87% of the matches using two variables for women. Conclusions: The results could be used to better understand the structure of the game in amateur leagues, and to improve the performance of teams.","PeriodicalId":51894,"journal":{"name":"Acta Gymnica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Gymnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/ag.2022.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The literature on performance analysis in team handball has increased at the top level, but there has been far less research published at the amateur level. Objective: The objectives of the present study were: (i) to compare handball game-related statistics by match result (winning and losing teams) for the men’s and women’s teams in an amateur league, (ii) to compare handball game-related statistics by gender, and (iii) to identify characteristics that discriminated performance in amateur men and women handball leagues. Methods: The game-related statistics of the 190 matches (113 men, 77 women) played in the 2018/19 Icelandic League by 12 men and 8 women teams were analysed. Their intraand inter-observer internal consistency and reliability were at levels considered to be good or very good for the games of both genders. Differences in the game statistics between match outcomes (winning or losing teams for each gender) and between the genders were determined using the unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and the corresponding effect sizes were calculated. Results: Large differences between the winning and losing teams were shown by shots, goalkeeper blocked shots, and 9 m shots for men, and by shots, goalkeeper blocked shots and 7 m shots for women. In the comparison between the genders, there were four variables that showed a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d > 0.50). A discriminant analysis applying the sample-splitting method was performed for each gender to determine the game statistics that best characterized the match outcomes. The resulting predictive models correctly classified 84% of the matches using five variables for men and 87% of the matches using two variables for women. Conclusions: The results could be used to better understand the structure of the game in amateur leagues, and to improve the performance of teams.
业余手球联赛输球队比赛相关统计数据中基于性别的差异
背景:关于团队手球表现分析的文献在顶级水平上有所增加,但在业余水平上发表的研究却少得多。目的:本研究的目的是:(i)比较业余联赛中男队和女队按比赛结果(输球队)划分的手球比赛相关统计数据。方法:对2018/19赛季冰岛联赛中12支男队和8支女队进行的190场比赛(113名男子,77名女子)的比赛相关统计数据进行分析。他们在观察者内部和观察者之间的内部一致性和可靠性被认为对两性游戏都很好或非常好。使用非配对t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验确定比赛结果(每个性别的输赢球队)之间以及性别之间的比赛统计差异,并计算相应的影响大小。结果:男性的射门、守门员盖帽和9米射门以及女性的射门、门将盖帽和7米射门显示出输赢球队之间的巨大差异。在性别之间的比较中,有四个变量显示出中等的效应大小(Cohen’s d>0.50)。对每个性别应用样本分割方法进行判别分析,以确定最能表征比赛结果的游戏统计数据。由此产生的预测模型对男性使用五个变量的84%匹配进行了正确分类,对女性使用两个变量的87%匹配进行了准确分类。结论:研究结果可用于更好地了解业余联赛的比赛结构,提高球队的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Gymnica
Acta Gymnica SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Gymnica" (ISSN 2336-4912 (Print); ISSN 2336-4920 (On-line)), published formerly as "Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica" (ISSN 1212-1185 (Print); ISSN 1213-8312 (On-line)), focuses on presenting results of research studies and theoretical studies from the field of kinanthropology. The scope of the journal covers topics related to biomechanics, exercise physiology, physiotherapy, somatometry, sports psychology, sports training, physical education, public health, etc. The journal also welcomes submissions that present results of interdisciplinary research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信