Cubesat Antenna Analysis and Design: Are you using the right computational electromagnetic tool?

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
I. Latachi, T. Rachidi, M. Karim
{"title":"Cubesat Antenna Analysis and Design: Are you using the right computational electromagnetic tool?","authors":"I. Latachi, T. Rachidi, M. Karim","doi":"10.7716/aem.v10i2.1517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antenna systems play a critical role in establishing wireless communication links and sustaining remote sensing requirements for Cubesat applications. In addition to the usual antenna design requirements, Cubesat-based spacecrafts impose additional stringent constraints related to the on-board available space, power consumption and development costs. To develop optimal antenna prototypes while considering all these constraints and decrease trial and error related costs, computational electromagnetics (CEM) simulation tools are used. The accuracy of simulation results depends to a great extent on the choice of the appropriate CEM tool for the particular antenna problem to be analyzed; ergo, identifying and answering key questions about design objectives and requirements is necessary for informed decision-making throughout the selection and design processes. However, this could be quite challenging because of existing gaps both in the practitioners’ knowledge about different CEM tools capabilities, limitations, and design know-how. This is especially true for non-specialists such as students and academics involved in student driven Cubesat projects. Therefore, the rationale of this manuscript is to bridge those gaps and clarify some common misconception commonly encountered during the selection and design processes. In that regard, first, an overview of existing antenna configurations commonly used in Cubesat communications is provided. Next, antenna design general workflow is presented. Then, capabilities and limitations of different CEM solving methods are presented. After that, CEM software selection process trade-offs and possible sources of errors are discussed from a practical viewpoint. Finally, a case study of Masat-1 antenna system design is presented as practical example.","PeriodicalId":44653,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Electromagnetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Electromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v10i2.1517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Antenna systems play a critical role in establishing wireless communication links and sustaining remote sensing requirements for Cubesat applications. In addition to the usual antenna design requirements, Cubesat-based spacecrafts impose additional stringent constraints related to the on-board available space, power consumption and development costs. To develop optimal antenna prototypes while considering all these constraints and decrease trial and error related costs, computational electromagnetics (CEM) simulation tools are used. The accuracy of simulation results depends to a great extent on the choice of the appropriate CEM tool for the particular antenna problem to be analyzed; ergo, identifying and answering key questions about design objectives and requirements is necessary for informed decision-making throughout the selection and design processes. However, this could be quite challenging because of existing gaps both in the practitioners’ knowledge about different CEM tools capabilities, limitations, and design know-how. This is especially true for non-specialists such as students and academics involved in student driven Cubesat projects. Therefore, the rationale of this manuscript is to bridge those gaps and clarify some common misconception commonly encountered during the selection and design processes. In that regard, first, an overview of existing antenna configurations commonly used in Cubesat communications is provided. Next, antenna design general workflow is presented. Then, capabilities and limitations of different CEM solving methods are presented. After that, CEM software selection process trade-offs and possible sources of errors are discussed from a practical viewpoint. Finally, a case study of Masat-1 antenna system design is presented as practical example.
Cubesat天线分析与设计:您是否使用了正确的计算电磁工具?
天线系统在建立无线通信链路和维持立方体卫星应用的遥感需求方面发挥着关键作用。除了通常的天线设计要求外,基于立方体卫星的航天器对机载可用空间、功耗和开发成本施加了额外的严格限制。为了在考虑所有这些约束条件的同时开发最佳的天线原型,并降低与试验和错误相关的成本,使用了计算电磁学(CEM)仿真工具。仿真结果的准确性在很大程度上取决于所要分析的特定天线问题选择合适的CEM工具;因此,识别和回答有关设计目标和需求的关键问题对于在整个选择和设计过程中做出明智的决策是必要的。然而,这可能是相当具有挑战性的,因为从业者对不同CEM工具的能力、限制和设计知识的了解存在差距。对于参与学生推动的立方体卫星项目的学生和学者等非专业人士来说尤其如此。因此,本手稿的基本原理是弥合这些差距,并澄清在选择和设计过程中经常遇到的一些常见误解。在这方面,首先概述了立方体卫星通信中常用的现有天线配置。其次,给出了天线设计的一般流程。然后,介绍了不同的CEM求解方法的能力和局限性。然后,从实际的角度讨论了CEM软件选择过程的权衡和可能的错误来源。最后,以卫星一号天线系统设计为例进行了实例分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Electromagnetics
Advanced Electromagnetics ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced Electromagnetics, is electronic peer-reviewed open access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of electromagnetic science and engineering. The aim of the journal is to become a premier open access source of high quality research that spans the entire broad field of electromagnetics from classic to quantum electrodynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信