Krytyka Platona przyjmowania uczestniczenia (ei;dh) rzeczy w postaciach () jako przyczynek do dyskusji na temat źródeł antynomii w podstawach matematyki

Kondrad Dydak Rycyk
{"title":"Krytyka Platona przyjmowania uczestniczenia (ei;dh) rzeczy w postaciach () jako przyczynek do dyskusji na temat źródeł antynomii w podstawach matematyki","authors":"Kondrad Dydak Rycyk","doi":"10.15633/ss.3514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is an attempt to answer the question about possible philosophical (non-mathematical) sources of antinomies revealed in mathematics at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Mathematical Platonism seems to be one of such sources. Is it possible, in Plato’s way of thinking, to really find the problem of the existence of objects, which in the context of the infinite set theory was mentioned by Georg Cantor? And if so, how does this problem solve Plato himself?","PeriodicalId":30875,"journal":{"name":"Semina Scientiarum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/ss.3514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is an attempt to answer the question about possible philosophical (non-mathematical) sources of antinomies revealed in mathematics at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Mathematical Platonism seems to be one of such sources. Is it possible, in Plato’s way of thinking, to really find the problem of the existence of objects, which in the context of the infinite set theory was mentioned by Georg Cantor? And if so, how does this problem solve Plato himself?
柏拉图关于接受事物在形式上的参与(ei;dh)的批判()是对数学基础中二律背反根源讨论的贡献
本文试图回答19世纪和20世纪之交数学中揭示的矛盾可能的哲学(非数学)来源的问题。数学柏拉图主义似乎就是这样一个来源。在柏拉图的思维方式中,有可能真正找到物体存在的问题吗?在无限集理论的背景下,格奥尔格·康托尔提到了这个问题?如果是这样的话,这个问题如何解决柏拉图本人?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信