Evidence-informed Approach to Setting Standards: A Discussion on the Research Strategies of AASB and AUASB

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mukesh Garg, Kris Peach, Roger Simnett
{"title":"Evidence-informed Approach to Setting Standards: A Discussion on the Research Strategies of AASB and AUASB","authors":"Mukesh Garg,&nbsp;Kris Peach,&nbsp;Roger Simnett","doi":"10.1111/auar.12314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper provides a commentary on the approach used by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) in setting standards which are consistent with their vision and mission to contribute to stakeholder confidence in the Australian economy, including its capital markets, and in external reporting. The objective of the paper is to inform a wide range of stakeholders including academics, assurance practitioners, investors, preparers of financial reports and regulators on how the two standardsetters use a robust and transparent evidence-informed approach to setting standards and guidance in Australia. The evidence is also applied to influence international standardsetters and to enhance key international relationships by demonstrating thought leadership. The AASB's and the AUASB's standard-setting process involves robust consultation with stakeholders and is guided by the evidence-informed standard-setting frameworks of the two boards. The paper also provides insight into how evidence is gathered and implemented by the standardsetters and discusses the process for building and maintaining strong relationships with the research community. The collaborative effort not only supports researchers in contributing to the academic literature but also for them to have a regulatory impact by informing the financial reporting and assurance standard-setting process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/auar.12314","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper provides a commentary on the approach used by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) in setting standards which are consistent with their vision and mission to contribute to stakeholder confidence in the Australian economy, including its capital markets, and in external reporting. The objective of the paper is to inform a wide range of stakeholders including academics, assurance practitioners, investors, preparers of financial reports and regulators on how the two standardsetters use a robust and transparent evidence-informed approach to setting standards and guidance in Australia. The evidence is also applied to influence international standardsetters and to enhance key international relationships by demonstrating thought leadership. The AASB's and the AUASB's standard-setting process involves robust consultation with stakeholders and is guided by the evidence-informed standard-setting frameworks of the two boards. The paper also provides insight into how evidence is gathered and implemented by the standardsetters and discusses the process for building and maintaining strong relationships with the research community. The collaborative effort not only supports researchers in contributing to the academic literature but also for them to have a regulatory impact by informing the financial reporting and assurance standard-setting process.

基于证据的标准制定方法:AASB与AUASB研究策略探讨
本文对澳大利亚会计准则委员会(AASB)和审计与鉴证准则委员会(AUASB)在制定符合其愿景和使命的标准时所使用的方法进行了评论,以促进利益相关者对澳大利亚经济(包括其资本市场)和外部报告的信心。该文件的目的是告知广泛的利益相关者,包括学者、鉴证从业人员、投资者、财务报告编制者和监管机构,这两个标准制定者如何使用稳健和透明的循证方法来制定澳大利亚的标准和指南。这些证据还被用于影响国际标准制定者,并通过展示思想领导力来加强关键的国际关系。美国会计准则委员会和美国会计准则委员会的准则制定过程包括与利益相关者进行强有力的磋商,并以两个委员会的循证准则制定框架为指导。该论文还提供了关于标准制定者如何收集和实施证据的见解,并讨论了与研究界建立和维持牢固关系的过程。合作努力不仅支持研究人员为学术文献做出贡献,而且还使他们能够通过通知财务报告和保证标准制定过程来产生监管影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信