Effect of Motherless Paternity Cases on the Interpretation of Parent age Investigations in a Population with Recurrent Inbreeding Practices

Ansar El Andari, I. Mansour
{"title":"Effect of Motherless Paternity Cases on the Interpretation of Parent age Investigations in a Population with Recurrent Inbreeding Practices","authors":"Ansar El Andari, I. Mansour","doi":"10.4172/2157-7145.1000395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, parentage testing relies mainly on the study of Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) DNA profiles. Parentage cases could be DUO (motherless/fatherless cases) or TRIO (where both parents' and child's DNA profiles are available). The absence of the DNA profile of one of the parents in DUO parentage testing increases the testing uncertainties. The Lebanese population is known to have a high rate of endogamous and consanguineous marriages, which challenges the power of discrimination of the DNA profiles among different individuals. \nThe present study aimed at evaluating the effect of motherless paternity cases on the interpretation of parentage investigations in the Lebanese population with recurrent inbreeding practices. 64 real DUO parentage exclusions and 15 real TRIO parentage exclusion cases were re-evaluated by assessing the possibility of false inclusions when decreasing DNA profile sizes or when simulating DUO cases from TRIO ones. \nOne case showed false positivity with 6 mismatches in its TRIO state, but only one mismatch in its DUO scenario. The probability of parentage (POP) obtained for this case after omitting the mismatch (a frequent inappropriate malpractice in some local laboratories) was 99.9%. This simulated DUO case was cleared as an exclusion when tested using DNA profile sizes of 24 STR markers. None of the other cases showed false positive results.","PeriodicalId":90216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensics research","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Currently, parentage testing relies mainly on the study of Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) DNA profiles. Parentage cases could be DUO (motherless/fatherless cases) or TRIO (where both parents' and child's DNA profiles are available). The absence of the DNA profile of one of the parents in DUO parentage testing increases the testing uncertainties. The Lebanese population is known to have a high rate of endogamous and consanguineous marriages, which challenges the power of discrimination of the DNA profiles among different individuals. The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of motherless paternity cases on the interpretation of parentage investigations in the Lebanese population with recurrent inbreeding practices. 64 real DUO parentage exclusions and 15 real TRIO parentage exclusion cases were re-evaluated by assessing the possibility of false inclusions when decreasing DNA profile sizes or when simulating DUO cases from TRIO ones. One case showed false positivity with 6 mismatches in its TRIO state, but only one mismatch in its DUO scenario. The probability of parentage (POP) obtained for this case after omitting the mismatch (a frequent inappropriate malpractice in some local laboratories) was 99.9%. This simulated DUO case was cleared as an exclusion when tested using DNA profile sizes of 24 STR markers. None of the other cases showed false positive results.
反复近交人群中无父无母案例对父母年龄调查的影响
目前,亲子鉴定主要依赖于短串联重复序列(STRs) DNA谱的研究。亲子关系案例可以是DUO(无父/无母案例)或TRIO(父母和孩子的DNA图谱都是可用的)。双亲子鉴定中父母一方DNA图谱的缺失增加了鉴定的不确定性。众所周知,黎巴嫩人口的内婚和近亲婚姻率很高,这对不同个人之间DNA图谱的歧视能力提出了挑战。本研究的目的是评价无母父权案件对黎巴嫩人口近亲繁殖行为的亲子调查解释的影响。通过减少DNA图谱大小或从TRIO中模拟DUO病例时,评估假包含的可能性,对64例真实的DUO排除病例和15例真实的TRIO排除病例进行重新评估。1例在TRIO状态下有6个错配,但在DUO情况下只有1个错配。在省略错配(一些地方实验室经常出现的不当行为)后,该病例的亲子关系概率为99.9%。当使用24个STR标记的DNA谱大小进行测试时,该模拟DUO病例被排除在外。其他病例均未出现假阳性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信